Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The field of victimology began as a branch of criminal justice studies focusing on the victims of crimes, with particular attention to identifying characteristics of people who became victims and the effects on an individual of being victimized.

However, the current definition of the field is much broader, so a victim is defined as anyone who suffers harm, while the effect of victimization has been broadened to include the consequences of being a member of a vulnerable group (even if a particular individual has no suffered harm).

Victimology in the context of disaster relief focuses on which individuals are most likely to be victims in a disaster, whether natural (such as the 2010 earthquakes in Haiti) or human-made (such as industrial accidents like the 1984 disaster at the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal, India) and the effects of victimization on the individual and their community.

It is not always possible or desirable to draw a distinct line between natural and human-made disasters, and often a disaster results from a combination of both “acts of God” and human behavior. For instance, the immediate cause of a flood may be a natural occurrence such as unusually heavy rainfall, but the effects of this rainfall may be exacerbated by human decisions such as allowing construction in the flood plain, building inadequate levees or failing to maintain them, or deforestation due to agriculture. With different human decisions, the same amount of rainfall in the same area might not have caused a flood at all. Similarly, while any industrial process carries risks, some charge that Union Carbide knowingly operated the Bhopal plant under unsafe conditions, which led to an explosion, the release of toxic chemicals, and thousands of deaths, while insufficient infrastructure and planning was cited by many as a co-contributor to the effects of the 2010 earthquakes in Haiti.

Inequality of Power

Inequality of power is a basic concept in criminal justice victimology, and applies to disaster victimology as well. Intuitively, it may seem that all are equally likely to suffer in a disaster, but history shows otherwise: inequality in society often leads to inequality in victim-hood. Thus, there is a political dimension to victimology in the context of disaster relief, which is concerned with social forces (such as poverty or discrimination) that may make some people more likely to be victims of a disaster, or affect the amount or rapidity of relief efforts to help them, and thus exacerbate the effects of being a victim.

In many societies, some classes of people occupy positions of relative privilege. For instance, in many countries, men have more rights and also hold greater economic and social power than women. Similarly, there is often a differential of power among racial or ethnic groups, and in almost any society, there are economic differences among people as well. Low status or low power individuals are often more likely to be victims of a disaster and suffer disproportionately as a result of their victimized status.

For instance, poor rather than rich people tend to live on property that is prone to flooding, in part because land and housing is cheaper in flood-prone areas. This was seen in the 2005 Hurricane Katrina floods in New Orleans: many poor, African-American neighborhoods were completely destroyed by the flooding, while many more prosperous white neighborhoods (built in areas known to be less prone to flooding) received much less damage.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading