Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Risk Communications
Risk communication consists of the integrated processes and procedures that involve and inform all interested publics with the factors associated around a risk. It involves exchanging information concerning the magnitude, significance, susceptibility, and possible control or avoidance of a risk. The goal of risk communication is to provide the public with messages containing useful information about the type and magnitude of an outcome from a behavior or context. The information is to be meaningful, relevant, accurate, clear, and in comprehensible terms to the target audience. Typically, risk communication involves messages about an event or the probability of the event manifesting. Risk communication attempts to disseminate information that will prepare people for a possible threat, and then provide the steps individuals should take if that risk manifests. Regardless if the process is one-way or transactional, or whether the goal is persuasion or informational, risk communicators typically begin with a gap to be bridged between the sender's assessment of a risk and the audience's assessment of a risk.
Hazard plus Outrage Equals Risk
As a technical concept, risk and subsequent communication is the focus on how to alert the public on the probability of a harmful event, and the magnitude associated with that event. The technical assessment of a risk typically models the impact of the potential risk on human activity in terms of harm, mortality, and physical damage.
One model of risk, proposed by risk communication expert Peter Sandman and colleagues, suggests that risk communication messages should be made up of two facets: scaring people and calming people down. Stated differently, it is the use of messages for alerting and reassuring people. The model further suggests that risk communication is the attempt to create a level of outrage that is suitable to the level or hazard; therefore, the model becomes Risk = Hazard + Outrage. If the public is outraged because they don't understand the hazard, then the public needs to be educated. If they do understand the hazard, address the outrage.
Hazard can be considered the technical seriousness of a risk, while outrage is cultural seriousness. Hazard is made up of constructs such as likelihood, magnitude, fear, mortality, mobility, and dread. Outrage responses may include both specific actions and emotional factors such as need for control, trust, and responsiveness. Emotional factors include worry, concern, anxiety, or alarm; these include the suspense caused by an awareness of danger and hostility.
Such emotional factors have the potential to motivate or impede actions; therefore, clear directions must be given to facilitate appropriate outrage. The correlation between the hazard (how many people are killed by the risk) and the outrage (how many people the risk upsets) is low. A risk communication message, therefore, needs to put the public's outrage at a level that is appropriate. Then the outrage can be managed and placed at an equivalent level with the assessment of hazard. Risk communication often requires a balance between two goals that appear contradictory. The risk message must induce enough fear so that the audience will take the required action. It must also prevent panic by those faced with the risk.
...
- Africa, North
- Africa, Sub-Saharan
- Asia, East
- Asia, West, Central, and South
- Australia and Pacific Region
- Canada
- Caribbean Island Region
- China
- Desertification
- Earthquake Zones
- Europe, Eastern
- Europe, Western
- Evacuation Routes
- Glacial Melt
- Hurricane Zones
- Japan
- Mediterranean Region
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Ring of Fire
- Russia
- South America
- United Kingdom
- United States, California and West Coast
- United States, Great Lakes
- United States, Hawaii and Pacific Territories
- United States, Mid-Atlantic
- United States, Midwest
- United States, Mountain States
- United States, National
- United States, Northeast
- United States, Northwest and Northern Plains
- United States, Southeast and Gulf Coast
- United States, Southwest
- American Red Cross
- Center for International Disaster Information (CIDI)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- ChildFund International
- Coast Guard, U.S.
- Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere (CARE)
- Defense, U.S. Department of Direct Relief
- Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Response Associations
- Doctors Without Borders
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Habitat for Humanity
- Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Institutional Coordination
- InterAction
- International Law in the Prevention and Mitigation of Disasters
- International Medical Corps
- International Red Cross
- Interpol
- Lutheran World Federation
- Mercy Corps
- National Governments
- Peace Corps
- Red Crescent Society
- Relief International
- Relief Rules
- Salvation Army
- St. Vincent de Paul
- State Governments
- United Nations
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
- United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
- World Concern
- World Emergency Relief
- World Food Program
- World Health Organization (WHO)
- World Relief
- World Vision
- History of Disaster Relief, Africa
- History of Disaster Relief, Ancient World
- History of Disaster Relief, China and East Asia
- History of Disaster Relief, Europe
- History of Disaster Relief, India
- History of Disaster Relief, Middle East
- History of Disaster Relief, North America
- History of Disaster Relief, Pacific Region
- History of Disaster Relief, Russia
- History of Disaster Relief, South America
- Chemical Disasters
- Cyberattacks
- Economic Disasters
- Food Contamination Disasters
- Gulf Coast Oil Spill (2010)
- Pandemic/Biological Accidents
- Poverty and Disasters
- Radiation Disasters
- Terrorism
- Wars
- Air Transport
- Food Distribution Infrastructure
- Internet
- Mass Transit
- Ports
- Railroads
- Roads
- Schools
- Utilities
- Water Systems
- Community Preparedness
- Community Response
- Evacuation
- Fire Departments
- Home Preparedness
- Local Hazards
- Municipal Offices of Emergency Management
- Personal Preparedness
- Police Departments
- Private Sector Preparedness
- Public Agency Preparedness
- Public-Private Partnerships
- University Preparedness
- Warnings
- Bubonic Plague
- HIV/AIDS
- Malaria (20th Century-Present)
- Measles (1850-Present)
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
- Smallpox (20th Century)
- Tuberculosis (20th Century-Present)
- Earthquakes
- Famine
- Fire
- Floods
- Hurricanes
- Terrorist Attacks
- Tsunami
- Volcanoes
- Wars
- First Aid
- Hysteria
- Pandemic Planning
- Panic
- Panic
- Psychology, Mass
- Psychology, Personal
- Social Work
- Stress Syndromes
- Survivor Guilt
- Working With the Bereaved
- Agricultural Production
- Business Continuity Planning
- Citizen Preparedness Programs
- Cooperation Between Civilian and Military Agencies
- Crisis Management
- Education
- Emergency Response Guidelines and Regulations
- Emergency Rooms
- Evacuation Planning
- Evacuation, Types of
- Exercise Planning
- Food Distribution Systems
- Healthcare
- Hospital Preparedness
- International Standards
- Language Issues and Barriers
- Levels of Nutrition
- Mass Casualty Management
- Media
- National Incident Management System (NIMS)
- National Standards
- Packaging and Tracing of Food
- Paramedics
- Political Economy of Food
- Provision of Food in Disasters
- Refugee Policy
- Refugees, Care of
- Reserve Storage and Transport
- Transportation
- Vulnerable Populations
- Incentives, Intergovernmental and Intersystem
- Mitigation, Benefits and Costs of
- Private Sector, Role in Mitigation
- Public Sector, Role in Mitigation
- Public-Private Interactions in Mitigation
- Regulatory Approaches to Mitigation
- Risk, Government Assumption of
- Risk, Individual Assumption of
- Structural (Engineering) Options for Mitigation
- Avalanches
- Diseases
- Droughts
- Earthquakes
- Fires, Forest
- Fires, Urban
- Floods
- Heat Waves
- Hurricanes/Typhoons
- Landslides
- Pest Invasions
- Sea Surges
- Tornadoes
- Tsunamis
- Volcanoes
- Winter Storms
- Bilateral Versus Multilateral Aid
- Domestic Corruption in International Disasters
- Domestic Politics in International Disasters
- Donations, National
- Donations, Personal
- Funding of International Relief
- Fundraising Cycles
- Politics in International Funding
- Rejection of International Aid
- Intergovernmental Relations and Preparedness
- Planning for Disasters, International
- Planning for Disasters, Local
- Planning for Disasters, National
- Political Support for Preparedness
- Preparedness, Function of
- Preparedness Policy Implementation
- Private Sector, Role in Preparedness
- Research-Based Disaster Planning
- Private Sector, Role in Recovery
- Recovery, International
- Recovery, Local
- Recovery, National
- Recovery, Phases of
- Recovery, Role of Governments in
- Private Sector, Role in Response
- Response, Management Strategies
- Response, Operational Strategies
- Response, Stress Impacts of
- Data Processing
- Early Warning and Prediction Systems
- Funding, U.S.
- Global Warming
- Modeling
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- Real-Time Communications
- Research
- Technology
- Technology, Military
- Causes of Complex Emergencies
- Cross-Cultural Interactions
- Cycles of a Disaster
- Disaster Experience
- Education
- Emergency Management Resources
- Ethics of Charity Relief
- Ethnicity and Minority Status Effects on Preparedness
- Gender and Disasters
- Human Rights
- Humanitarian Intervention Versus Humanitarian Action
- Income Inequality and Disaster Relief
- Laws
- Personal Preparedness
- Politics, Domestic
- Politics in International Funding
- Protection of Civilians in Conflict Zones
- Public Policy
- Refugees
- Relief Versus Development
- Risk Communications
- Risk Management
- Risk Perceptions
- Social Impact of Disasters
- Training for Disasters
- Victimology
- United States, California and West Coast
- United States, Great Lakes
- United States, Hawaii and Pacific Territories
- United States, Mid-Atlantic
- United States, Midwest
- United States, Mountain States
- United States, National
- United States, Northeast
- United States, Northwest and Northern Plains
- United States, Southeast and Gulf Coast
- United States, Southwest
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches