Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

For approximately the last 50 years, scientists from numerous academic fields have converged to develop a body of scholarship termed disaster research. Scholarship in this area includes, but is not limited to, the study of disaster mitigation and preparation, disaster vulnerability, community and infrastructure resilience, recovery efforts, psychological consequences of disaster, crisis communication, the intercultural impact of disasters, and economic recovery. Disaster research has drawn the interest of scholars from fields as diverse as sociology, psychology, public health, communication science, civil engineering, economics, and public policy. This research is conducted with the end goal of improving public policy and emergency planning, and minimizing the harm caused by future disasters.

As a field, disaster research has its roots in the founding of the Disaster Research Center (DRC), at Ohio State University in 1963 (it later moved to the University of Delaware in 1985). Led by sociologists E. L. Quarantelli and Russell Dynes, the center began conducting field and survey research on preparation for, response to, and recovery from natural and technological disasters and other community-wide crises, looking at these factors across group, organizational, and community lines. Researchers at the DRC began the tradition of comparative field studies examining differences in the social conditions surrounding hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hazardous chemical incidents, and plane crashes. The DRC also extended this research into criminological research, exploring the causes and consequences of civil disturbances such as looting and rioting. Continued interest in disaster research has spawned other major research centers devoted to the study of disasters and crises. These include the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado, the Center for Natural Hazards Research at East Carolina University, the Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response at New York University, the Center for Disaster Research and Education at Millersville University, and the Center for Natural Hazards and Disaster Research at the University of Oklahoma, among others.

Methodological Disaster Research

Disaster research relies on a number of methodological techniques that are typically matched to particular sets of research questions. Much of the groundbreaking work conducted by the Disaster Research Center was—and continues to be—reliant on field surveys and longitudinal panel designs intended to examine the sociological impact of disasters on communities and regions. Other research has relied on anthropological approaches, such as participant observation and field studies, in order to get a sense of what is happening on the ground in the aftermath of a disaster. Still other research, particularly research focused on the actions of disaster relief agencies and government officials, has used a case study approach to identify best practices in disaster relief and learn from past incidents.

The methods utilized by disaster researchers have, at times, received criticism. Empirical and sociological research in particular has been the target of scrutiny concerning the samples selected, instrumentation employed, and the validity of self-response data collected from those under extreme duress. However, those interested in examining the characteristics of disasters face a number of methodological and data analytic challenges.

Disasters are often unexpected, nonroutine events that create conditions unfavorable for traditional methods of data collection. By their very nature, disasters are crises of an exceptionally novel nature, and their unpredictability often makes data collection difficult at best. For example, access to the site of a disaster is often restricted. In some situations (such as natural disasters, fires, or chemical spills), the site of a disaster may be extremely dangerous, and data collection can therefore create significant personal risk. Federal, state, and local agencies are often understandably preoccupied with managing the event, and thus may not be interested in talking with researchers.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading