Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Vulnerability to disasters can be defined as the susceptibility to harm or losses of people and their livelihoods, and of communities and socioeconomic systems in general. It implies absence or insufficiency of coping mechanisms and lack of capacity to anticipate the effects of disaster and recover from them, all of which amounts to a lack of resilience. Vulnerability is not exactly synonymous with poverty, as there are communities of people who live in absolute poverty, but against massive odds, and have organized themselves to resist disaster impact. However, throughout the world, in almost any context, vulnerability to disasters goes hand-in-hand with poverty, which is the root cause of that vulnerability. Moreover, disasters have been instrumental in both setting back and reducing opportunities for economic development. Hence, poverty is usually a good guide to disaster vulnerability. For example, the earthquake of December 23, 1972, in Nicaragua killed 5,000 people and injured 20,000 in the capital city, Managua. Serious damage occurred throughout a 16-square-mile area, and 660,000 people were left homeless. With access to capital, insurance, and loans, most rich and middle-class residents rebuilt their homes within six months. For the poor, if reconstruction occurred at all, it took many years.

The Difficult Task of Defining Poverty

Poverty can be considered as both an absolute and a relative phenomenon. Absolute poverty (also known as extreme poverty) amounts to destitution, and indicates the lack of basic necessities. The United Nations (UN) World Summit on Social Development, held in Copenhagen in 1995, defined it as “a condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services.” Hence, poverty is about both access to resources and empowerment. Relative poverty signifies a standard of living that falls below a threshold of a combination of basic needs and general economic levels in a particular country. It is usually measured in terms of income inequality, and is a function of the distribution of wealth in a particular country or region.

So many factors contribute to poverty that it is not an easy phenomenon to measure, especially as some of the indicators may be elusive. Hence, it can be exaggerated or understated, sometimes for political reasons. In the light of this, and to produce a worldwide comparison, in 1990, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) began to compile the Human Development Index (HDI), summaries of which are published in its annual Human Development Reports. The index uses life expectancy at birth, adult literacy rate, and per-capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to define relative levels of development.

It is assumed, with good reason, that each of these is related to poverty levels. The index is a good measure of the ranking of development and well-being among countries, but in reports by the UNDP, it does not give any insight into the variations in wealth and poverty within individual countries. These can be very large indeed. For example, in Recife, Brazil's fifth-largest metropolis, some parts of the city have HDIs that are high enough to be comparable with Scandinavian countries, while others have HDIs on a level with North Africa. Globally, from 1999 to 2008, nearly 2,000 disasters occurred in countries with a high HDI, but more than 5,000 happened in nations with medium and low HDIs.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading