Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Planning for Disasters, National
The most fundamental level at which emergencies must be tackled is obviously the local level, for however large the disaster is, the local area is always the theater of operations. However, several thresholds of competence exist in relation to the possible magnitude of events. If the immediate needs generated by an emergency cannot be satisfied by local or even regional resources, then the national government must become involved. At the level of a country's sovereign state, planning for emergencies is a question of safeguarding the national interest—if the event is serious enough, it is a matter of safeguarding the integrity of the nation and guaranteeing its survival without descent into ungovernable anarchy. It is also a matter of ensuring equity and welfare for survivors and people threatened by the crisis. Fortunately, relatively few emergencies are serious enough to require full-scale national mobilization. Most commonly, the emergencies that fulfill this criterion are natural disasters such as major earthquakes, floods, or tropical cyclones, or human-triggered cases of major environmental damage, catastrophic pollution, disease pandemics, or very large terrorist atrocity.
Types of National Response Institutions
National disaster plans are a function of the way in which emergency response is organized at the national level. In synthesis, there are two end members of a broad spectrum of permutations: civil defense is a centralized, top-down system, in which command is vested in national government, which directs local operations; and civil protection is a decentralized, bottom-up system, in which the role of the national government is to provide support and harmonization for locally- and regionally-organized efforts. In practice, the distinction is not quite so simple. Even a fully decentralized system may be overridden by central government in the national interest, while a fully centralized system is unlikely to function without strong local and regional support. Nevertheless, over the past half century there has been a long-term trend toward collaboration.
The nature of the institutions that a country uses to manage its largest emergencies depends on several factors, including the form of the state (for example, federal republic, unitary state, island state, kingdom, devolved state); the nature of its legal system; and the role attributed to civil society organizations, particularly voluntary societies such as the national Red Cross or Red Crescent Society and other rescue and relief agencies. Under most circumstances, the U.S. government cannot override the interests of the states and local authorities; hence, it tends to concentrate on providing assistance. Such is the division of powers between states and the federal level that the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and its umbrella organization, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), have had only limited success in encouraging states to prepare for disaster and harmonize their emergency plans.
A National Park Service helicopter hovers over the destruction of the Pentagon, where a hijacked American Airlines flight crashed on September 11, 2001. National emergency planning soon shifted to emphasize counterterrorism and centralized emergency responses

However, since March 2008, the United States has had a National Response Framework (NRF), which provides guidelines for homogenizing the response to disasters that involve states, communities, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
...
- Africa, North
- Africa, Sub-Saharan
- Asia, East
- Asia, West, Central, and South
- Australia and Pacific Region
- Canada
- Caribbean Island Region
- China
- Desertification
- Earthquake Zones
- Europe, Eastern
- Europe, Western
- Evacuation Routes
- Glacial Melt
- Hurricane Zones
- Japan
- Mediterranean Region
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Ring of Fire
- Russia
- South America
- United Kingdom
- United States, California and West Coast
- United States, Great Lakes
- United States, Hawaii and Pacific Territories
- United States, Mid-Atlantic
- United States, Midwest
- United States, Mountain States
- United States, National
- United States, Northeast
- United States, Northwest and Northern Plains
- United States, Southeast and Gulf Coast
- United States, Southwest
- American Red Cross
- Center for International Disaster Information (CIDI)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- ChildFund International
- Coast Guard, U.S.
- Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere (CARE)
- Defense, U.S. Department of Direct Relief
- Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Response Associations
- Doctors Without Borders
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Habitat for Humanity
- Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Institutional Coordination
- InterAction
- International Law in the Prevention and Mitigation of Disasters
- International Medical Corps
- International Red Cross
- Interpol
- Lutheran World Federation
- Mercy Corps
- National Governments
- Peace Corps
- Red Crescent Society
- Relief International
- Relief Rules
- Salvation Army
- St. Vincent de Paul
- State Governments
- United Nations
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
- United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
- World Concern
- World Emergency Relief
- World Food Program
- World Health Organization (WHO)
- World Relief
- World Vision
- History of Disaster Relief, Africa
- History of Disaster Relief, Ancient World
- History of Disaster Relief, China and East Asia
- History of Disaster Relief, Europe
- History of Disaster Relief, India
- History of Disaster Relief, Middle East
- History of Disaster Relief, North America
- History of Disaster Relief, Pacific Region
- History of Disaster Relief, Russia
- History of Disaster Relief, South America
- Chemical Disasters
- Cyberattacks
- Economic Disasters
- Food Contamination Disasters
- Gulf Coast Oil Spill (2010)
- Pandemic/Biological Accidents
- Poverty and Disasters
- Radiation Disasters
- Terrorism
- Wars
- Air Transport
- Food Distribution Infrastructure
- Internet
- Mass Transit
- Ports
- Railroads
- Roads
- Schools
- Utilities
- Water Systems
- Community Preparedness
- Community Response
- Evacuation
- Fire Departments
- Home Preparedness
- Local Hazards
- Municipal Offices of Emergency Management
- Personal Preparedness
- Police Departments
- Private Sector Preparedness
- Public Agency Preparedness
- Public-Private Partnerships
- University Preparedness
- Warnings
- Bubonic Plague
- HIV/AIDS
- Malaria (20th Century-Present)
- Measles (1850-Present)
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
- Smallpox (20th Century)
- Tuberculosis (20th Century-Present)
- Earthquakes
- Famine
- Fire
- Floods
- Hurricanes
- Terrorist Attacks
- Tsunami
- Volcanoes
- Wars
- First Aid
- Hysteria
- Pandemic Planning
- Panic
- Panic
- Psychology, Mass
- Psychology, Personal
- Social Work
- Stress Syndromes
- Survivor Guilt
- Working With the Bereaved
- Agricultural Production
- Business Continuity Planning
- Citizen Preparedness Programs
- Cooperation Between Civilian and Military Agencies
- Crisis Management
- Education
- Emergency Response Guidelines and Regulations
- Emergency Rooms
- Evacuation Planning
- Evacuation, Types of
- Exercise Planning
- Food Distribution Systems
- Healthcare
- Hospital Preparedness
- International Standards
- Language Issues and Barriers
- Levels of Nutrition
- Mass Casualty Management
- Media
- National Incident Management System (NIMS)
- National Standards
- Packaging and Tracing of Food
- Paramedics
- Political Economy of Food
- Provision of Food in Disasters
- Refugee Policy
- Refugees, Care of
- Reserve Storage and Transport
- Transportation
- Vulnerable Populations
- Incentives, Intergovernmental and Intersystem
- Mitigation, Benefits and Costs of
- Private Sector, Role in Mitigation
- Public Sector, Role in Mitigation
- Public-Private Interactions in Mitigation
- Regulatory Approaches to Mitigation
- Risk, Government Assumption of
- Risk, Individual Assumption of
- Structural (Engineering) Options for Mitigation
- Avalanches
- Diseases
- Droughts
- Earthquakes
- Fires, Forest
- Fires, Urban
- Floods
- Heat Waves
- Hurricanes/Typhoons
- Landslides
- Pest Invasions
- Sea Surges
- Tornadoes
- Tsunamis
- Volcanoes
- Winter Storms
- Bilateral Versus Multilateral Aid
- Domestic Corruption in International Disasters
- Domestic Politics in International Disasters
- Donations, National
- Donations, Personal
- Funding of International Relief
- Fundraising Cycles
- Politics in International Funding
- Rejection of International Aid
- Intergovernmental Relations and Preparedness
- Planning for Disasters, International
- Planning for Disasters, Local
- Planning for Disasters, National
- Political Support for Preparedness
- Preparedness, Function of
- Preparedness Policy Implementation
- Private Sector, Role in Preparedness
- Research-Based Disaster Planning
- Private Sector, Role in Recovery
- Recovery, International
- Recovery, Local
- Recovery, National
- Recovery, Phases of
- Recovery, Role of Governments in
- Private Sector, Role in Response
- Response, Management Strategies
- Response, Operational Strategies
- Response, Stress Impacts of
- Data Processing
- Early Warning and Prediction Systems
- Funding, U.S.
- Global Warming
- Modeling
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- Real-Time Communications
- Research
- Technology
- Technology, Military
- Causes of Complex Emergencies
- Cross-Cultural Interactions
- Cycles of a Disaster
- Disaster Experience
- Education
- Emergency Management Resources
- Ethics of Charity Relief
- Ethnicity and Minority Status Effects on Preparedness
- Gender and Disasters
- Human Rights
- Humanitarian Intervention Versus Humanitarian Action
- Income Inequality and Disaster Relief
- Laws
- Personal Preparedness
- Politics, Domestic
- Politics in International Funding
- Protection of Civilians in Conflict Zones
- Public Policy
- Refugees
- Relief Versus Development
- Risk Communications
- Risk Management
- Risk Perceptions
- Social Impact of Disasters
- Training for Disasters
- Victimology
- United States, California and West Coast
- United States, Great Lakes
- United States, Hawaii and Pacific Territories
- United States, Mid-Atlantic
- United States, Midwest
- United States, Mountain States
- United States, National
- United States, Northeast
- United States, Northwest and Northern Plains
- United States, Southeast and Gulf Coast
- United States, Southwest
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches