Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Evacuation is a social process where agents relocate from one area threatened by exceptional social and structural disruption to an area perceived as less threatening. Five main concepts characterize evacuation. First, evacuation is a socially constructed process in that humans play a significant role in the development of social and physical structures that may facilitate or hinder the ability to evacuate. Second, evacuation is a process in that there exists a before, during, and after, as opposed to a singular event or moment in time. Thus, while it is common to think of evacuation as lasting for a specified duration, the concept is best understood through an exploration of the lead time before the threat, the presentation of the threat, and the aftermath following the threat. Third, evacuation consists of agents who may be constituted as individuals, groups, organizations, or communities. Agents may conflict or work in concert with one another to facilitate or hinder the evacuation process. Fourth, evacuation is contextualized by space and movement. Evacuation originates with agents in one area under the presentation of a threat, at which point agents attempt to relocate. Finally, evacuation is characterized by a threat that has the potential to generate exceptional social and structural disruption. Threats are symbolically referenced features that have the potential to significantly disrupt social structures and the built environment in ways that encourage agents to move from the potential impact area.

Three Main Types of Evacuation

While there are some differences between scholars, evacuation is often conceptualized into three major domains, or types, that are not mutually exclusive or collectively exhaustive. The term vertical evacuation refers to a social process where agents relocate from one threatened area to an upper area or areas of the same physical structure. Vertical evacuation is a process dependent upon the scope of the threat, and is common in rising water hazards such as floods, hurricanes, and tsunamis. However, the evacuation process may occur whether or not a threat impacts agents. Depending upon the scope of the exception, vertical evacuation may offer some advantages over other forms of evacuation, as it may dramatically reduce the likelihood of agents trapped between their area of origin and their intended evacuation location. If possible, it is recommended that vertical evacuations accompany some form of preparation, rather than become an evacuation process of last resort. Vertical evacuation should rarely, if ever, be viewed as an appropriate form of evacuation if safer and more accessible forms are available. Horizontal, or site evacuation, refers to a social process where agents relocate from one area threatened by exceptional social disruption to an area or structure that is perceived as less threatening.

Horizontal evacuation is the most common type of evacuation, and frequently involves an attempt to shelter in private or public areas. Not all agents who begin the evacuation process may complete the process to their intended destination. Nonetheless, some scholars, such as Enrico Quarantelli, Kathleen Tierney, Michael Lindell, and Ronald Perry have sought to focus on the evacuation site as an important consideration for understanding the overall context of the evacuation process. During and following a threat, agents may evacuate to an emergency shelter, which is different from a temporary shelter. Emergency shelters, or shelters of last resort or refuge, are intended to provide structurally safe areas for very short periods of time, generally less than 24 hours, to survive the exceptional threat. Temporary shelters provide evacuation facilities for agents, generally for a few hours to less than three weeks, to those whose original area or structure is under greater perceived threat from the exception. A horizontal evacuation may take place whether or not agents are completely out of the danger of the exception. For this reason, attention should focus on reducing the likelihood of exposure to the threat, rather than focusing on the elimination of threat exposure for all agents.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading