Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Curriculum research can take many forms including those that transcend national boundaries. Such research provides perspectives that are either cross-national (involving several national jurisdictions and including direct comparisons of those jurisdictions or providing regional perspectives across a group of countries) or international (involving multiple national jurisdictions that might be taken to give international coverage). Such research is often set in quite specific theoretical frameworks, but this is not a necessary criterion for designation as transnational. A broad range of possible theoretical possibilities encompasses such research, and these are discussed later to frame transnational curriculum research.

In an age of global interconnectedness that is often fueled by economic processes such as globalization, it might be expected that curriculum research across national boarders will assume greater significance. Increased communication between researchers means that common issues and problems will be more easily identified and transnational research teams more easily formed. Nation-states themselves have readily recognized the value of international studies of student performance and researchers have picked up on the secondary analysis of these studies to provide more focused and at times more relevant research. Yet individual researchers have not been slow to recognize the value of national comparative research, especially those who have always worked within a comparative tradition where by definition comparison is the research method of choice. Transnational curriculum research, therefore, takes a variety of forms and relies on a range of methodologies. It can be used to address policy priorities that transcend national borders, it can pursue issues that affect individuals in different locations as they confront oppression and discrimination, or it can focus on traditional academic concerns that are common to different jurisdictions. The key point is that researchers are able to pursue such research collaboratively (i.e., in cross-national teams) and without constraints (i.e., without direct accountabilities to nation states). The benefits of such approaches will greatly enhance the field of curriculum studies.

Theoretical Frames

The International Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies and its journal, Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, have made a concerted effort to create a theoretical framework for transnational curriculum research. The intention has been deliberately emancipatory in seeking to create spaces outside of the constraints of national boundaries to pursue curriculum research agendas. Working outside of national boundaries creates possibilities to think about curriculum issues and problems in new and different ways. The cross-fertilization of ideas that can occur in transnational spaces as educators talk and act can be a powerful force for change.

This theoretical framework is best understood in the broadest sense as postmodernist or post-structuralist. A reaction to the standardization and homogenization of curriculum thinking is often seen to characterize the modern nation-state. Neil Gough has referred to this theoretical stance as postcolonialist. This highlights that aspect of transnational curriculum research that is aligned to the achievement of social democratic goals and the creation of more just and tolerant societies. In this sense, transnational curriculum research is linked theoretically to broader movements in literary and cultural studies that have similar objectives that clearly locate academic work in the broader social, political, and economic contexts that construct them.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading