Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Like the signifier “education,” psychoanalytic theory may be associated with a wide range of events, histories, ideas, people, practices, arguments, hopes, failures, fears, fantasies, institutions, and cultural (nonclinical) applications. Although both are an experience and a means to modify it, psychoanalytic theory signifies deconstruction of the subject's intentions. This theory takes apart and then reconstitutes explicit or intended meaning to reach what is latent and implosive in any utterance: something unsaid and unintended, something unconscious that exerts and pressures, in negated form, the fantasies, anxieties, and desires of the speaking subject. How words come to matter, lose their object, signify lack, and then resist this thinking are all met by its method and goal of free association, that is, speaking whatever is in one's mind with an interest in narrating what stops it short: censorship, judgment, or moral anxiety. Free association is the capacity to make a clearing from that which is its poor relation: neurotic symptoms, nagging thoughts, obsessions, inhibitions, compulsions, and ruinous, repetitive acts. From this estranging material, the accidental speaking subject becomes curious about her or his inner world and its play of affect. Simply stated, psychoanalytic theory is a language, a structure, a method, and a practice for listening and interpretation. It approaches language as both a momentous event and the means for symbolizing the reverberations of its excesses and revenants. Psychoanalytic theory opens the study of curriculum to what is most subjective and unconscious in knowledge and our attachment to it. This entry discusses the role of psychoanalytic theory in learning, the schools of psychoanalytic thought and their application to curriculum studies, and the role of psychoanalytic theory in literacy.

Learning and Psychoanalytic Thought

Learning is presented as the means to change not only what is in one's mind but the mind's structure. The mind's content, however is seen through a psychological prism, expressing, though displacement and condensation, the drives and idiomatic desire. Ideas are erotically linked to images, people, fantasy, fragments of lost events and relations, and to pieces of the body, all named “objects” or “imagos.” The ongoing problem of learning entails learning to live with others on the way to becoming an “I.” Education is presented as both needed and as subject to its own pathologies. Any learning is learning from uncertainty and conflict and therefore becomes the capacity to tolerate the mental pain of thinking from the unknowable and the incomplete. Yet this means that learning is inextricably tied to anxiety, a signal of danger that links the external and internal worlds. The interest is in moving from frustration to symbolization. Although this view of the human leans on what is tragic in the human condition, it is also concerned with what is beyond the tragic, namely processes that may bring one to a larger truth: creativity, imagination, aesthetics, and the desire for symbolization.

The primary concern is with the trauma of human suffering and its congealed expressions that animate problems within the demand for happiness and then reverberate in experiences of unhap-piness, melancholia, and mourning. It proposes that the human suffers from meaning through a series of developmental losses, all affecting the fantasized body: loss of the breast, the genitals, the other, one's own body. These losses the finite erotic human must suffer and then signify what these losses come to mean in relations of love, hate, knowledge, and how they seamlessly blend into work, sociality, and political life. Although the body and its oral, anal, phallic, and genital phases are the raw material of symbolization, these metaphorical phases coexist throughout life and are found in situations of aggression and fantasy expressed in behaviors such as stealing, hording, copying, name-calling, and more devastating orders of social destruction. Psychoanalytic theory emerges then from problems of eros in human understanding and misunderstanding and opens questions into the ways the external world is internalized and, too, how the internal world is externalized through both language and bodily symptoms. It asks the question, from where does misery come? Its theory addresses such issues as the human's enigmatic resources of existential life such as dreams, art, and music, to speculations on human development and its psychic life, to paradoxes of self/other relations, to that which resists or escapes the anchor of meaning, and then, onto questions of the theory itself: how its theory affects therapeutic action, or the transformations of both the theory and its subject. Its boundaries are as porous as the imagination.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading