Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

To understand what is taught and learned in schools, curriculum researchers must explore understandings of masculinity and femininity because they are interwoven with formal school subjects, sports and clubs, and discipline and authority. Gender has always been a dimension of schooling with some differentiation, and often segregation, of females and males common worldwide. Popular beliefs attribute differences between males and females to biology, but bodily processes are objects of social practice. Research has documented the mutability, socially constructedness, and historical specificity of what counts as male and female and as masculine and feminine. Schools are invoked in current assessments of gains toward and unfulfilled hopes of gender equality. Schools are now understood as places that produce gendered beings and understandings rather than just responding to preexisting differences in girls and boys. Masculinities and femininities are produced in schools in complex interactions with other accented differences, such as race/ethnicity, social class, sexual orientation, disability or ability, and language. Almost every aspect of schooling has been linked to gender: single-sex and coeducational practices, academics, sports, romance, and sexuality. Although gendered assumptions continue to be challenged and revised, their commonsense quality (we can see anatomical and behavioral differences between boys and girls!) makes them comfortable and comforting. And when we presume sharp differences between males and females, we are likely to see such distinctions. The durability of marked gender differences can be traced to their intertextual character—that is, the fact that narratives, language, emotions, and morality about gender differences operate across many popular culture, political, economic, legal, religious, and family arenas of life. And many people, including researchers and educators, have investments in maintaining intelligible masculinities and femininities, which exhibit coherence among (biological) sex, gender, sexual practices, and desires.

Theories

Gender researchers begin from different theories, outlooks, and assumptions that influence how gender is understood and studied, as well as how plans for change are made. Social constructionism is the most popular theoretical stance; in general, social constructionists theorize that there is an interaction between individual traits (biology, dispositions, and family upbringing, for example) and broader social norms and prevailing ideas of masculinity and femininity. There are more and less radical versions of social constructionism; more conservative versions hold that dominant masculinities and femininities will be quite similar in different historical and cultural contexts. More radical perspectives claim that gender arrangements vary enormously and inevitably across time and place and that there is, in fact, a coconstruction of the biological and the social. Coconstructionists argue, for example, that men's higher testosterone levels follow from social dominance as much as they precede it.

All social constructionists utilize some, however limited, conception of biological nature or essence. Alternatively, Judith Butler theorizes gender as performativity—stylized practices repeated over and over so they begin to appear to be a person's nature—and refuses any essentialism. This theoretical stance understands gender as produced through repetitive discourses and actions, which are grounded in the assumptions of heterosexual-ity. Performativity links sexuality and gender, while multicultural femininists have theorized intersections of gender and race, gender and class, and gender and nation.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading