Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Curriculum Studies, Definitions and Dimensions of

Curriculum studies deals with a robust array of sources that provide the following: (a) perspective on questions about what curriculum is or ought to be, (b) alternative or complementary paradigms of inquiry that enable explorations of such questions, and (c) diverse possibilities for proposing and enacting responses to the questions in educational theory and settings of educational practice. This tripartite emphasis on perspective, paradigm, and possibility depicts substantive concerns of curriculum studies and serves as the organizing structure of this entry. A necessary beginning is to clarify the origins of curriculum studies.

Origins

The term curriculum studies evolved during the past half century from its forerunner known as curriculum development, a term that emerged in the 1930s to designate a field that evolved at the beginning of the 20th century to facilitate curriculum (courses of study) for schools in the expanding project of universal schooling. Curriculum studies is a term that designates a shift of theory and practice as scholars sought understanding of curricula as phenomena of interest and societal import in contrast with sole concentration on service to leaders of practice in schools. By the early 1970s, widely recognized curricularists determined that their work should not primarily provide a basis for curriculum development in schools. They realized that if they simply served the will of schools, they were inadvertently supporting the will of those who made policy for schools. Such policy was thought to misrepresent public interests because it was conjured to fulfill the interests of the most wealthy and powerful members of society. This argument brought a wide range of scholarly sources to the forefront, such as diverse philosophies, literary and artistic works, and a range of social, political, and economic perspectives. Interests of equity and social justice, as well as self-realization and identity, have emerged as major topics of emphasis. The cause of societal maintenance that schools had long served was deemed limited if not puerile as a reason for scholarship. Thus, the guiding questions of curriculum studies are pursued relative to whatever configurations of human association or community lend themselves to such pursuits and are not relegated to school alone. By 1982, the scholarly area of curriculum studies was fully instantiated by the educational research community, symbolized by the renaming of the curriculum division of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) as Curriculum Studies rather than Curriculum and Objectives, which was the name that had prevailed for the previous two decades.

The following sections discuss each of the three main topics of curriculum studies: perspective, paradigm, and possibility.

Perspective

Curriculum studies derives perspective from the following: key questions it pursues, the field of inquiry, and its history, context, philosophy, and policy.

Key Questions

Introduced above, questions about what is worthwhile for human beings to grow into fully functioning individuals and contributors to the advancement of their social worlds is the central purpose of curriculum studies. Although pursuit of such questions traditionally has been considered a problem of schooling, it is now deemed a problem of any association of human beings or relationship among human beings that addresses these questions. To address these questions requires familiarity with bodies of knowledge accumulated by curriculum scholars and often summarized and reconceptualized in synoptic curriculum texts. Acquisition of such knowledge derives from a legacy of socialization into practical and scholarly dimensions of the field of curriculum studies. However, such socialization is not statically reproductive; rather, it embodies a strong call to imagination that builds on, and even departs from, the legacy of previous curriculum studies to create novel extrapolations. For instance, debate has ensued for many years about fairness and justice relative to answers afforded questions of worth. For instance, whose version of worth is being promoted or denied at a given time and place? The assumption is that other questions of education (e.g., pertaining to management, finance, psychology of learning, remediation, subject matter learning, policy formulation and implementation, teacher education, professional development, change, or reform) are contingent upon questions of what is worthwhile.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading