Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Simply put, curriculum evaluation refers to the process of placing value on a curriculum. Evaluation may focus on a curriculum's design, including content and process; its implementation; or outcomes. It may take place on a broad scale, for example, evaluation of the scope and sequence of a state's K–12 curriculum in all subject areas. Or it may be more specific, as in the evaluation of textbooks adopted for a school district's spelling curriculum in Grades 1 through 6, or a teacher's own test of a curriculum's outcomes. Evaluation may be national or local; external, involving outside reviewers or internal; or involving teacher and student judgment. Although curriculum is ordinarily associated with schools, curriculum evaluation occurs within any institution that educates through a formal curriculum, for example, religious organizations, businesses, hospitals, museums, and libraries. Curriculum evaluation is often thought of as summative, but usually involves both formative and summative procedures. It may be informal, drawing on a variety of teacher-made techniques or a formal process that utilizes standard procedures and instruments.

Curriculum evaluation schemes reflect different philosophical stances regarding education and range from highly rational and objective to interpretive and subjective approaches. In a rational process, curriculum evaluation is tied to objectives. Evaluation determines whether or not objectives and the learning experiences designed to achieve them produce desired changes in student behavior. Interpretive models are intentionally subjective and rely on observing and recording of experience, immersion of the evaluator in a situation, interpretation, and judgment. The goal is to disclose events, their worth, and quality.

Purposes of Evaluation

Purposes of evaluation vary and range from the teacher's informal assessments of how students are engaging with materials to standardized tests given at the termination of a curriculum to measure and compare student outcomes. The results of evaluation are used in curriculum design, adaptation, revision, and to inform policy. Results inform decisions about goals, content, organization, learning materials and experiences, methods of assessment, and the teacher's role. The teacher's role in curriculum is an important part of evaluation because some designs call for the teacher to be an active agent who makes decisions about goals, content, organization, and the like. Other designs expect the teacher to focus on instruction, taking a more passive role in regard to the actual design. Although teachers usually gather evaluation data in ongoing assessment and revision of curriculum and to improve their own classroom practice, evaluation data that are gathered on a district-, state-, or nationwide basis becomes more public and political in nature as student outcomes are compared and implications are drawn from the results by the press, the public, and politicians. Hence, evaluation also influences local, state, and national education policy. Likewise, it may influence educational policy within institutions that educate. Public education has seen an increasing emphasis on summative curriculum evaluation through standardized testing in order to hold schools accountable and make them responsible for closing the achievement gap between children from differing social, cultural, and economic circumstances. Curriculum evaluation, then, informs a social and political process that, in turn, influences curriculum design.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading