Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

For almost a century, ASCD (the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) and its two predecessor groups have fostered attention of many of the nation's educators to instructional improvement and the development of curriculum, initially in the United States, but more recently throughout the world. Rather than focus on particular school roles or positions (e.g., English teachers, supervisors of science, superintendents), ASCD has focused on functions common or similar to different roles and tasks in and across school divisions (e.g., elementary school, high school; differentiated instruction, reading). Deliberately, it always has welcomed to its membership all individuals not only professional educators, but also people who do not hold professional credentials (e.g., school board members, parents) who are concerned with improvement of the school curriculum and teaching as well as those who participate in local improvement efforts. From the time it began operations, ASCD has continued to be an anomaly among professional organizations in U.S. education. To be sure, the contemporary ASCD differs in some remarkable ways from its beginnings in 1943 even as it maintains, at least in name, some of its early programs, purposes, and structures.

Origins of the Organization

ASCD was the fruit of the merger of the National Education Association (NEA) Department of Supervisors and Directors of Instruction and of the Society of Curriculum Study. Both of these organizations began in the 1920s.

The supervision group, founded in 1921 as the National Conference on Educational Method, brought together school leaders who were particularly interested in the potential of William Heard Kilpatrick's “Project Method.” Several years later as the Project Method waned in popularity, the organization recognized the value of highlighting various general teaching methodologies. In 1929, the conference became a department of the NEA with changed name. Its membership was never large, but most of its members were school supervisors. College and university faculty members as well as state level instructional supervisors constituted two other significant but smaller constituencies. Its major publication was The Journal of Educational Method, subsequently retitled Educational Method. In 1928, ASCD began the publication of a series of well-regarded yearbooks. It held twice yearly meetings, at the meeting of the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) in the late winter/early spring and at the NEA annual meeting in the summer.

Especially important to this group was James F. Hosic, formerly a supervisor of English in the Chicago public schools and the founder of the National Council of Teachers of English. As a doctoral student at Teachers College, Columbia University, he came to believe that Kilpatrick's Project Method was one that was appropriate for use in almost every course offered at every school level. Hosic called what became the organizational meeting of the conference and, later, as a faculty member at Teachers College, he served as the group's executive secretary and editor of Educational Method.

The second party to the merger that created ASCD was the much smaller Society for the Study of Curriculum. This group's beginnings can be traced to a very small and informal discussion group convened by L. Thomas Hopkins, then a consultant to the highly publicized Denver Curriculum Program. The discussants were six school curriculum leaders who met at the 1924 AASA meeting and who agreed to invite a few colleagues and to meet again the following year during the AASA convention. This informal group slowly added members, and in 1929, it formally organized itself and, after two name changes, it took the name of Society for the Study of Curriculum. Like the Department of Supervisors and Curriculum Directors, the society met annually at the AASA winter/spring convention.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading