Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Toch, Hans: Coping in Prison

Hans Toch's perspective on coping in prison can briefly be stated as the efforts of inmates to adjust to their environment by negotiating stressors induced by the institutional setting. Although Toch made numerous contributions to penology and criminology more broadly, his perspective on coping in prison may be his most notable. Toch's perspective is perhaps best represented by his books Living in Prison: The Ecology of Survival and Coping: Maladaption in Prisons, coauthored with Kenneth Adams and J. Douglas Grant. The books resulted from two large-scale studies of inmates confined in prisons operated by the state of New York that Toch directed while he was serving as a professor in the School of Criminal Justice at the State University of New York at Albany. This entry reviews each of these scholarly works, followed by a discussion of Toch's theoretical contributions and impact on correctional practice.

Living in Prison: The Ecology of Survival

Living in Prison was based primarily on findings from in-depth interviews with inmates housed within five maximum-security prisons operated by the State of New York. Toch framed the study within a psychological perspective on transactions, which assumes human uniqueness and recognizes that individuals’ needs may vary within the same context. Toch recognized differences among inmates in how they prioritized their needs, which contributed to how they perceived aspects of prison environments. Therefore, the same aspects of a prison environment may influence inmates differently based on whether that feature of the environment frustrated or facilitated satisfaction of their needs.

Toch identified seven environmental concerns that were salient for inmates in prisons: privacy, activity, safety, structure, support, emotional feedback, and freedom. Privacy refers to a preference for isolation, peace, and quiet and to the absence of environmental irritants (e.g., noise, crowding). Satisfaction of the need for privacy involves reducing external stimuli to streamline experience and ease adjustment. Activity reflects a concern about understimulation. Activity may be important to inmates who need their time to be filled with distraction, entertainment, or action. Safety refers to a concern for one's physical well-being and a preference for social and physical settings that provide protection and minimize the chance of being victimized. Structure is a preference for predictability, orderly routines, clear-cut rules, and consistent enforcement. Support reflects a concern for reliable, tangible assistance from persons and settings, and for services that facilitate self-advancement and self-improvement. Emotional feedback is a concern about being loved and appreciated and refers to a desire for relationships that provide emotional sustenance and empathy. Freedom is a concern about maintaining autonomy and a desire for minimal restrictions on space and activity. In addition to the seven environmental concerns revealed by the interviews, Toch also identified social stimulation as a potential concern. Social stimulation is a concern with congeniality and a preference for settings that provide an opportunity for social interaction and companionship.

Toch observed that the importance of environmental requirements varied across inmates due to their personal experiences and motives. For example, Toch found that different environmental preferences corresponded with different background characteristics of inmates (e.g., race, criminal history). Differences between inmates influenced the needs required to facilitate coping and ultimately adjustment to the prison environment.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading