Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In “Social Structure and Anomie,” Robert Merton presented both a macro-level anomie theory and micro-level strain theory. At the macro-level, Merton argued there were two structures in society: the cultural structure and the social structure. The cultural structure consists of the culturally defined goals and the norms or culturally proscribed means that should be utilized to achieve the goals. The social structure consists of an individual's location in society and determines the means available to the person. When there is a disjunction between the culturally defined goals and the means that people have available to them, strain is placed on the norms, which results in a state of anomie or normlessness. When anomie ensues, people are free to use whatever means necessary to achieve their goals and thus often results in high crime rates.

Although Merton's anomie theory has been widely used in the disciplines of criminology and sociology, Alex Thio disagrees with Merton's argument that members of the lower class have a higher disconnection between their aspirations and their opportunities resulting in higher crime rates. Thio suggests that Merton does not see the important relationship between social class and relative deprivation. In addition, Thio explains that there is a difference between relative and absolute deprivation, a component of power theory. Therefore, Thio believes that many criminologists overlook the participation in deviant behaviors by higher-class members of society. In fact, he suggests that the advantaged are more likely to participate in deviant activities for a variety of reasons, especially because of relative deprivation.

Two Types of Deprivation

In “A critical look at Merton's anomie theory,” Thio argues that there are two different types of deprivation: (1) absolute deprivation and (2) relative deprivation. Absolute deprivation, which is considered to be objective deprivation, occurs when there is a real deficiency in a particular resource or necessity, such as income (Stiles et al., 2000). For example, if an individual has an income level below the poverty line, he or she is considered to be poor or experiencing absolute deprivation. Thus, Thio argues that although individuals that experience absolute deprivation do set high goals, they realize that these goals are too unrealistic and unlikely to be achieved given their current situation, such as living in poverty.

Relative deprivation, on the other hand, is considered by Thio to be more subjective. Relative deprivation is a feeling of being unable to achieve relatively high aspirations compared to other people or being jealous of the material objects or income level another person possesses. For instance, although individuals may have an annual salary of $100,000, they may feel as if they are poor compared to their colleagues, friends, neighbors, or family members that have an annual salary of more than $100,000. Therefore, relative deprivation can be seen as a social comparison. People in society are always comparing themselves to what others have and “try to keep up with the Joneses.” This social comparison can lead individuals to believe that they need more money and thus push them to participate in deviant acts to acquire more money. Hence, the more people experience relative deprivation, the more likely they are to commit deviant acts, according to Thio.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading