Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Matza, David, and Gresham M. Sykes: Subterranean Values and Delinquency

Following their work on the “techniques of neutralization” in 1957, David Matza and Gresham M. Sykes elaborated their perspective on delinquent conduct. It is not enough, they argued in “Juvenile Delinquency and Subterranean Values,” to explain how individuals cognitively free themselves from social control—that is, to know “how an impetus to engage in delinquent behavior is translated into action” (p. 713). It also is essential to explain “what makes delinquency attractive in the first place” (p. 713). In the occurrence of delinquent conduct, techniques of neutralization represent the how whereas the concept of subterranean values Matza and Sykes explained why—“the values and ends underlying delinquency and the relationship of these values to those of the larger society” (p. 713).

The why seemed obvious to many—that delinquents were “disturbed” and sought things they should not. But Sykes and Matza dismissed the notion of the disturbed delinquent, pointing to evidence that delinquents were actually conformists most of the time, and were quite capable of feeling guilt and shame for their actions. Rather than some “disturbed” social environment, most were exposed to the same societal pressures that produced non-delinquents. With the techniques of neutralization Sykes and Matza showed how, using culturally acceptable reasons, “normal” individuals could convince themselves that they were not actually doing something wrong. This focus on the normal, as opposed to the disturbed, led Matza and Sykes to search for values in the mainstream American value system that could produce delinquency.

Deviant Values?

Drawing on a burgeoning literature on delinquents, particularly the behavior of youths in street gangs, Matza and Sykes (1961) found several “underlying values” that they concluded are entirely consistent with the mainstream American value system. The first of these is a preference or desire for “excitement,” an adventurous life filled with “displays of daring” and “charged with danger.” Next, delinquents value an ethic of “grandiose dreams and quick success.” This contrasted with the notion that one gets ahead through hard work. Better to make one's financial success through the easy score and outwitting one's peers. Finally, the delinquent values a “readiness for aggression” that is often observed in gang violence. The use of aggression, however, is not a pathological drive to create suffering; rather it “is a demonstration of toughness and thus of masculinity.”

At first glance, this “cluster of values” appears to represent a disturbed subculture that deviates “from the dominant society,” rather than a reflection of conventional American values. Not so, argue Matza and Sykes. In fact, these values appear eerily similar to “the code of the ‘gentlemen of leisure’ depicted by Thorsten Veblen” (p. 714). Daring and adventure, rejecting the “prosaic discipline of work,” a taste for consumption and luxury, and the valuation of masculine endeavors—these are all prototypical of the “leisured elite.” It thus appears that non-delinquent members of society's upper classes possess the same values as their lower-class counterparts. The only difference, as Matza and Sykes see it, is the expression of those values in the form of delinquency. All youths, then, subscribe to a similar set of American values; the delinquent's values are no more deviant than the law-abiding youth's values.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading