Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Hare, Robert D.: Psychopathy and Crime

Robert D. Hare is a forensic psychologist and Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia (Department of Psychology, Forensic Psychology). In addition, he is the president of Darkstone Research Group, which is a research and consulting firm. He is most well-known for research on psychopathy. This entry provides an overview of Hare's contributions to the study of psychopathy, with a focus on his research aimed at understanding the nature, measurement, and application of the construct of psychopathy.

Psychopathy

Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by specific interpersonal, affective, and behavioral features. Interpersonally, psychopathic individuals are manipulative, conning, and deceitful. Affectively, there is marked absence of remorse (for wrongdoings) and a general inability to experience emotions. In terms of behavior, psychopathy is characterized by impulsivity, irresponsibility, a history of antisocial behavior, and criminal versatility. In large part, this conceptualization of psychopathy is based on Hare's research aimed at operationalizing the construct (Hare, 2003). Hare drew heavily from Hervey Cleckley's clinical observations. After years of research and refinement, Hare created a structured assessment of psychopathy: The Psychopathy Checklist—Revised.

The Psychopathy Checklists

Hare is most well-known for his efforts at operationalizing the construct of psychopathy. Specifically, he developed the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R). The PCL-R is a 20-item measure that assesses four facets of psychopathy. One facet is labeled interpersonal, and includes traits that assess the manipulative, conning, and deceitful interpersonal styles exhibited by psychopathic individuals. The second facet is referred to as the affective component and taps into the callous, unfeeling, and remorseless emotional life experienced by psychopathic individuals. These two facets form what has traditionally been referred to as factor 1 of psychopathy. The second factor also contains two, lower-order facets. The behavioral facet refers to the impulsive and irresponsible manner in which psychopathic individuals typically behave. The fourth facet, labeled antisocial, measures the early and persistent aggression, delinquent, and criminal behavior characteristic of psychopathic personality disorder.

The purpose of the PCL-R is to measure the extent to which an individual possesses the traits and behaviors characteristic of psychopathy. For each of the 20 items, individuals can be scored as 0 (does not apply), 1 (applies to some extent), or 2 (definitely applies), resulting in a possible range of 0–40. The score is based on two sources: a review of file data (e.g., an individual's prison records) and an in-depth interview. Although scores from the PCL-R are normally distributed (Hare, 2003), there are guidelines that have been developed to designate a clinical cutoff. Specifically, an individual who receives a score of 30 or more is deemed to be psychopathic. From a clinical standpoint, there needs to be a score at which a diagnosis can be made. Moreover, some research suggests that psychopathy is categorical, meaning that those scoring above a certain threshold (in this case, 30 or greater) are qualitatively distinct from those scoring under the threshold. However, other studies have failed to replicate this finding, which is consistent with how others view psychopathy as existing on a continuum.

The taxometric analyses aside, the PCL-R has demonstrated sound psychometric properties in several other domains. For example, Hare and Craig Neumann provide compelling evidence regarding the internal consistency of the 20 items (a ranges from .81 to .89). Despite the fact that clinical judgment is required to score the PCL-R, Hare and Neumann found that interrater reliabilities are quite high (ICCs range from .88 to .97). In addition, Hare's 2003 research indicates that the factor structure of the PCL-R is stable. However, there is an ongoing debate of whether psychopathy is better represented by three or four factors. Because the PCL-R has shown such strong psychometric properties and has substantial clinical utility, it is considered to be the gold standard for measuring psychopathy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading