Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Brain Abnormalities and Crime

Despite the large body of knowledge accumulated by neuroimaging research in the last few decades associating criminal behavior to various neurobiological risk factors, the most well-known theories of criminology remained focused on the use of social and environmental variables to explain criminal and antisocial tendencies. The lack of inclusion of a neurobiological aspect in these theories prevents an in-depth understanding of the complicated biosocial mechanisms underlying criminal behavior, specifically regarding the role that brain abnormalities play in predisposing individuals to criminal and/or violent behavior. This gap in theories can be viewed as problematic especially since several reports have confirmed high rates of brain abnormalities among death row inmates, forensic psychiatric inpatients, and other individuals with a history of violence.

The phrase brain abnormalities is often employed, as an umbrella term, to describe congenital or acquired anatomical or functional alterations in the brain. Brain abnormalities have long been associated with psychiatric disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder (APD) and psychopathy, of which criminal behavior is a prominent feature. Several hypotheses and models have been proposed based largely on empirical evidence from brain imaging literature.

This entry reviews a key hypothesis, the frontal lobe dysfunction hypothesis, which has received a great deal of attention in the past few decades with regard to the neural bases of antisocial, criminal behavior. Specifically, the theory as well as the supporting empirical evidence from lesion, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging findings of structural and functional brain abnormalities in the frontal lobe of criminal offenders and antisocial individuals is discussed. This is followed by a discussion on other models of brain abnormalities and crime, specifically the somatic marker hypothesis and the violent inhibition mechanism, which focuses on brain deficits underlying poor decision making and moral reasoning aspects of criminal offending. This entry concludes with an assessment of the hypothesized link between brain abnormalities and crime, and with a discussion of implications for future studies.

Frontal Lobe Dysfunction Hypothesis

The frontal lobe has long been linked to antisocial criminal behavior due to the critical role of this brain region in executive function. The development of this hypothesis has been prompted by lesion, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging studies to explain the behavioral tendency for rule-breaking in criminal offenders. The frontal lobe dysfunction hypothesis proposes that structural and functional deficits to this brain region impair the higher cognitive functioning such as moral decision making, impulse control and emotion regulation, which contribute to criminal offending. This hypothesis received support from Brown and Price, who reviewed the neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings of incarcerated criminals and concluded a high correlation between frontal dysfunction and increase in aggression and antisocial behavior.

Lesion studies have reported changes in personality, specifically an increase in antisocial criminal behavior, following injuries to the frontal lobe. The increase in risky deviant behavior was particularly noticeable when the damage to the frontal lobe involved the orbitofrontal regions. Several case studies have described patients with damage to the orbitofrontal regions, particularly the medial orbitofrontal cortex, to show marked deficits in real-life tasks demanding moral judgment, impulse control, interpersonal sensitivity, and the evaluation of future consequences, while revealing minimal impairments on standard neuropsychological tests of intelligence and executive functions. These patients were also found to show frequent explosive aggressive outbursts. In addition, it has been demonstrated that when prefrontal lobe damage occurred earlier in life (e.g., before the age of 8), the patient suffered a more severe outcome of behavioral disturbances, including executive dysfunction, poor abstract conceptual thinking, impaired theory of mind, and immature moral reasoning later in life.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading