Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Annotated Further Readings: Labeling and Interactionist Theories of Crime

Athens, Lonnie: Interaction and Violence

Athens, L. (2003). Violentization in larger social context. In J. T. Ulmer (Ed.), Violent acts and violentization: Assessing, applying, and developing Lonnie Athens’ theories (pp. 1–42). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

In this article, Athens intended to extend his violentization theory toward the macro-social perspective. Efforts were made to establish the linkage between the micro-level theory and macro-level social characteristics, such as social structure and community culture. With the newly amended theory, Athens expected to counter the criticism that violentization theory fails to see the larger social context underlying violent conduct.

Ulmer, J. T. (Ed.). (2003). Violent acts and violentization: Assessing, applying, and developing Lonnie Athens’ theories. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

Articles with in-depth discussions of Athens's arguments about the decision process, self-image, and interpreting social experience of violent criminals are gathered in this edited book. The contributors’ works enhance Athens's violentization theory and also provide insights on linking Athens's theory to social learning theory and labeling theory in a comparative manner.

Becker, Howard S.: Labeling and Deviant Careers

Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

This is Howard S. Becker's primary work on deviance and, according to his website, is all he has to say on the topic to date.

Bernberg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006).

Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88.

This work is a current reexamination of labeling theory as is applies today. The article also references the work of Becker and others that may enhance understanding of labeling theoretical perspective.

Cole, S. (1975). The growth of scientific knowledge: Theories of deviance as a case study. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 175–220). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

This article was cited by Howard S. Becker on his website and provides another perspective on the theoretical approach to deviance.

Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New

York: McGraw-Hill.

In Social Pathology, Edwin Lemert developed the concepts of primary and secondary deviance. This distinction was an early statement of how societal reaction can stabilize individuals in deviant or criminal careers that otherwise might have been transitory.

Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. Boston: Ginn.

This work is considered to have great impact and influence in the formation of labeling theory and thus is essential in the creation of this perspective. In order to more fully understand the concepts that Becker discusses in his work and later studies in which empirical observations and findings are framed under labeling theory, an understanding of the historical foundation of the theory could be useful.

Chambliss, William J.: The Saints and the Roughnecks

Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. London: Free Press.

Becker's classic book explains why some people are labeled as deviant and some are not, even for the same acts. The process and outcomes of labeling are explained by Becker.

Macleod, J. (2008). Ain't no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading