Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Abolitionism, according to Stanley Cohen, is a critical thinking movement about criminology, crime, punishment, and criminal law that has been developing in Western Europe since the early 1970s. John Muncie characterizes abolitionism as a knowledge-based movement that seeks to move beyond the essentialist ideas of crime, criminality, and criminal justice to facilitate new critical insights and alternative visions of justice.11

The impetus of the abolitionist movement was dissatisfaction with current crime and criminal justice policy. This discontent was not only with the basic assumptions of criminal justice policies but also with the concrete consequences of criminal justice functioning, according to Louk Hulsman. Abolitionism is based heavily on deconstructionist impulses in the form of the questioning of dominant criminal justice theories and practices.

There is no concrete definition of abolitionism. To some, abolition requires doing away with the entire criminal justice system and to others abolition implies the end of penal law as it presently exists. Abolition is considered possible as the concepts of “crime” and “punishment” are not considered to be absolute, fixed responses to “undesirable events.” Abolition requires a different verbiage when dealing with undesirable events as well as a different view of society, namely a vision of how society could be alternatively structured.

Abolitionism advocates are primarily based in England, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway. While the abolitionist movement has its strongest support in European nations, there is support for abolitionism in the United States.

Forms of Abolitionism

Abolitionism comes in two forms: general and restricted. General abolitionism contends that the criminal justice system as a whole is a social problem and thus should be dismantled. At the core of general abolitionism is the belief that punishment itself, at least as it takes place in the current criminal and penal law model, is ineffective, inefficient, and inhumane. Proponents of general abolitionism argue specifically for alternatives to the current processes of criminal justice. It is argued that the criminal justice system should be replaced with alternative dispute settlement procedures. These community-based dispute resolutions would allow for the creation of social policy that reduces the pressure on individuals to resort to criminal means to secure their necessities.

Restricted abolition deals with the abolition of a specific aspect of the criminal justice system. This form of abolition seeks to address specific aspects of the criminal justice system that have been deemed a social problem. Proponents of specific abolitionism movements seek to eliminate specific criminal justice-related sanctions and policies in order to make the system more effective and humane. Significant restricted abolition movements include death penalty abolition and penal abolition.

The Prison Abolition Movement

The prison abolitionist movement has been at the forefront of prison reform since the 1970s. Advocates call for the eradication of the incapacitation in its current form and scale. It is believed that prisons further exacerbate pre-existing social ills and fail to provide adequate social control. There are several major groups strongly backing penal abolition including Britain's Radical Alternatives to Prisons (RAP), the Norwegian Association for Penal Reform (KROM), the Danish Association for Penal Reform (KRIM), and the Swedish Association for Penal Reform (KRUM).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading