Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The most common and widely known form of lie detection uses a polygraph instrument. Although such detection is controversial for a number of reasons, even its most adamant proponents would acknowledge that it has limitations. The first limitation is that, because there is no known physiological response unique to “lying,” the polygraph instrument does not really detect “lies”; it merely records physiological data that vary when one undergoes stress, such as the stress that accompanies lying. Thus, the person who administers the examination and interprets the physiological data must be well trained and must assess the physiological information accurately after it is collected in a manner consistent with accepted procedures in order for “lie detection” to work. That is, the process must be properly applied, and the instrument used must be capable of detecting stress. The polygraph, thus, can be seen merely as a “stress detector,” a collector of physiological information. A second limitation is that some persons are not responsive to polygraph testing; testing them may produce “inconclusive” results. This occurs in approximately 5 percent of the cases, although corrective actions may, in some instances, reduce that percentage somewhat. A third limitation is that polygraph testing requires physiological monitoring by means of apparatus that must be physically attached to the person undergoing questioning. The examinee is always aware that he or she is being monitored. What if lie detection could be accomplished by means of covert monitoring? Such an approach might have great appeal to those in law enforcement and intelligence work, where traditional polygraph testing has played an important role for more than seventy years.

The Promise of Voice Stress Analyzers

The promise of a better lie detector, one that can be used covertly, is what has been offered by developers of various so-called voice stress analyzers (VSAs). These devices all claim to be able to detect lies by electronic assessment of certain frequency changes in the vocal spectrum. They have been known by various brand names, such as the initial device marketed from about 1970 to the mid-1980s, the Psychological Stress Evaluator (PSE) and its imitators—Hagoth, Verimetrics, LEA Mark V, and the Computerized Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA).

The basic “theory” on which all of these devices are based is that, in the spoken word (i.e., the vocal spectrum), there are subaudible, involuntary frequency modulations (FM) that are superimposed on audible voice frequencies. The strength and pattern of these frequency modulations vary inversely with the degree of stress in a speaker at the moment of an utterance, such as “yes” or “no” or more lengthy statements. It is claimed that the FM results from minute oscillations of the muscles of the voice mechanism; these are known as physiological tremors and are said to be under the control of the central nervous system (i.e., the voluntary system) during nonstressful periods, but as stress is imposed, the autonomic nervous system (generally, involuntary) gains dominance, resulting in a suppression of the microtremors. This suppression, said to indicate stress, is detected and displayed by voice stress analyzers in characteristic blocked or rectangular wave forms, which, moreover, are indicators not only of stress but also, in their shape, of the degree of stress being experienced.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading