Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Discretion within the criminal justice system is “the lawful ability of an agent of government to exercise choice in making a decision” (Neubauer 1999: 17). With regard to the office of the prosecutor, such choices include whether to begin an investigation, instruct the police to make an arrest, recommend release on bail, reduce or dismiss charges, present a case to a grand jury, offer a negotiated plea, make a sentencing recommendation, and in the most serious cases, seek the death penalty. While some federal and state prosecutors handle civil suits, the importance and power of prosecutorial discretion is most apparent in the functioning of local prosecutors who represent the citizens in their jurisdictions against people accused of crimes. The choices such prosecutors make have a profound impact on the lives of defendants and victims, and the criminal justice system as a whole.

Gatekeepers to the Criminal Courts

Prosecutors have been referred to as “the most influential of the courthouse actors” (Neubauer 1999: 9), but their role can begin long before a criminal case reaches the courthouse. While the role of the prosecutor is often thought of as beginning only after an arrest has been made, prosecutors sometimes directly investigate allegations of criminal activity. Such investigations may be conducted by the prosecutor's staff or the police, or may involve the two working together. A prosecutor decides which complaints will be investigated and the extent of that investigation. Only those that the prosecutor decides warrant further attention have the potential to enter the court system. If an investigation does not reveal evidence that the prosecutor feels is sufficient to warrant further action, the suspect does not become a criminal defendant. In most cases, whether guilty or innocent, suspects will not even know that they have been under investigation. Complex cases involving organized crime or white-collar offenses often begin as investigations within the prosecutor's office. In such cases, only after evidence has been collected and successfully presented to a grand jury for an indictment do warrants issue and arrests occur.

The grand jury is one of the oldest Anglo American criminal justice institutions. Although abolished in the United Kingdom, it has been retained in most U.S. states. Ideally, the grand jury is an independent mechanism for screening the prosecution's evidence in felony cases. In practice, however, whether an indictment is issued is very much influenced by the prosecutor: It is the prosecutor who decides whether to place a case before the grand jury, which evidence to present, and how it is presented. And since at trial there must be enough evidence to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecutor always focuses on evidence that indicates guilt.

In order to determine the charges in a given case, a prosecutor must have a working knowledge of the criminal statutes in his or her jurisdiction, because in order to sustain a conviction the available evidence must match the requirements of the law. If the alleged actions fit the definition of more than one offense, it is the prosecutor who decides which charges are most appropriate. Indictments may contain multiple charges and counts, and some prosecutors have been accused of overcharging defendants in order to induce a plea bargain.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading