Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In its simplest form, the term private security refers to the protection of people, property, and information. In its most complex form, it refers to individuals and businesses that provide, for a fee, services to clientele to protect their persons, their private property, or their interests from various hazards. The broadness of this definition indicates how expansive the scope of private security is. Because private security has alternately been referred to in the literature as private policing, asset protection, and protective security, there is little consensus among either academics or practitioners about what to call the field. There is even more disagreement as to whether it is a subfield of criminal justice, a specialization within schools of business or management, or merely an applied area of study within one of these disciplines. With such little agreement among practitioners and academics as to what constitutes private security, it is not surprising that there is no single definition. Despite the lack of agreement about what private security is and its place in the social sciences, a common thread ties together all security issues, ranging from protecting buildings and property to protecting corporate executives, from identifying shoplifters to protecting against identity theft, from detecting cybercrime to reducing baggage theft at airports. This common thread is the central focus of security—loss prevention. Loss prevention refers to the practice of reducing the chances that a loss will occur and minimizing the loss in the event that one does occur.

Historical Development

Much of the disagreement about what constitutes private security and its legitimacy as a social science discipline is rooted in historical context. The practice of using people to protect property and people is centuries old. It originated in the Middle Ages (approximately 500 to 1500), when land barons who owned large estates began taking political and economic control of nearby estates. The land barons were allowed to keep their property in exchange for pledging allegiance to the king and agreeing to provide armed men to assist the king when necessary. This system of social and economic organization is called feudalism. Where the peasants of the neighboring estates that were taken over by the land barons once had to protect themselves against marauding bands of thieves, they could now rely on the land barons for protection. In exchange for this protection, however, the peasants had to swear their allegiance to the land barons and turn over their property and other holdings to them.

Each land baron usually had many people working for him in various capacities, including retainers and knights. In today's protective forces, retainers would be akin to infantrymen, and knights to special forces. In general, the knights were higher ranked and required greater training and skill than the retainers. Still, each group of men was expected to protect the political and economic interests of the land baron. Among the problems land barons encountered were kidnapping, theft, robbery, and piracy. When noblemen and land barons traveled into the countryside they were often accompanied by several retainers to prevent being kidnapped or robbed. This practice may have laid the groundwork for the first executive protection force.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading