Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Preventive detention in the United States is a fairly recent procedure for denying pretrial release to defendants the court decides are dangerous and a threat to the community. It developed as a response to growing concern over the belief that an increasing amount of crime was being committed by persons awaiting trial. Judges had for years informally achieved preventive detention for defendants who were deemed likely to commit additional crimes during the pretrial period by setting cash bail sufficiently high to ensure that the defendant would be unable to raise the required bond. Although the statutory purpose of bail is to ensure that the defendant will appear for trial, preventive detention adds new issues for the court to consider in the evaluation of the defendant's pretrial status. Beyond the defendant's likelihood of appearance, the judge may also decide whether he or she is sufficiently dangerous to create a threat to the safety of the community or any witness to the proceedings.

Preventive detention has been used in England for many years, but as a postconviction procedure rather than a pretrial determination. British judges are permitted to examine the conduct of prisoners about to be released, and if they are found to still be a threat to society, they may be “preventively detained” for an extended period of time until the prisoner is no longer considered dangerous.

The constitutional position on bail and pretrial release in the United States is found in the Eighth Amendment, which holds that if bail is set, it must not be excessive. The United States Supreme Court has consistently held that this amendment does not guarantee all defendants a right to pretrial release. As clarified in Stack v. Boyle (1951), bail is excessive if it is set at a figure higher than an amount reasonably calculated to fulfill the purpose of ensuring the presence of the accused at his or her trial. There is no absolute right to bail, and the Supreme Court has therefore permitted federal and state courts to prohibit the pretrial release of defendants who are accused of crimes such as capital offenses where defendants may be facing the death penalty. Currently, many jurisdictions exclude defendants charged with murder, kidnapping, rape, and treason from possible pretrial release.

Early History

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, as the nation's crime rate began a dramatic increase, researchers discovered a disturbing parallel rise in crimes committed by defendants who had obtained their pretrial release and were awaiting trial. One of the most thorough studies of pretrial crime was conducted in the late 1960s (Wice 1974) by the National Bureau of Standards in Washington, D.C., which discovered that 12 percent of defendants awaiting trial in the nation's capital committed an additional felony. Congress, with strong support from the Justice Department, enacted the District of Columbia Court Reform Act of 1970, which contained the nation's first preventive detention statute. Although the provisions of the statute would apply only to the criminal courts within the District of Columbia, it encouraged state legislatures across the nation to enact similar preventive detention statutes. For the first time in the nation's history, defendants could be denied pretrial release because of their possible dangerousness.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading