Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Military justice is the legal system for adjudicating criminal allegations against active-duty members of the United States military forces and Coast Guard. All service members'criminal conduct, whether committed in the United States or abroad, in a military or civilian community, may be tried in this system of laws and courts. Military justice is separate from the civilian criminal court system, and it complements but is separate from the law of warfare, martial law, and the variety of laws pertaining to noncriminal legal requirements of the armed forces.

Characteristics of Military Justice

The purpose of the military forces is national defense. Military justice provides the legal foundation for obliging service personnel to suffer privation, injury, and possible death in order to protect the nation. of necessity, military service mandates the loss of some personal liberties and deference to values and practices not found in civilian society. Military justice has the task of incorporating American concepts of justice and providing a criminal law system that produces good order and discipline in the military forces. Accordingly, it reinforces the hierarchical military command and authority structure by empowering commanders to exercise significant prosecutorial discretion and judicial authority, by distinguishing between enlisted personnel and commissioned officers, by sanctioning insubordination with criminal penalties, and by criminalizing disobedience of military superiors' orders.

In addition to prohibiting the usual crimes of civilian criminal law, military justice defines criminal conduct in combat conditions and punishes poor duty performance and absenteeism—an annoyance in civilian life, but one that is devastating in military operations. Because military personnel are stationed around the world, frequently reassigned, and usually exempt from the laws of foreign nations, the system must be efficient and capable of operating abroad and in combat conditions.

History

American military justice imitated British practice of the mid-eighteenth century. Drawn from Roman military law, which recognized a need for a military disciplinary system separate from civil society's criminal law provisions, British and American military justice were instruments for administering whatever harsh and swift discipline a commander thought appropriate. The new Constitution invested Congress with responsibility for making “Rules for the Government and Regulation of the Land and Naval Forces …” (art. I, sec. 8), including the rules for military criminal proceedings. Major American wars, with their masses of civilian conscripts and volunteers, produced political pressure for reform and Congress responded with legislation, incrementally shifting military justice practices toward the civilian model.

None

A promotional drawing supporting the role of the military police from the U.S. Military Police Handbook (1975).

Widely perceived as unjust during World War II, military justice was a major postwar issue in America. In 1951, Congress enacted the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), a criminal code common to all the service branches. The new provisions pushed military justice even closer to civilian criminal law practices and stripped commanders of some of their authority over court-martial proceedings. In the late twentieth century, Congress continued making piecemeal adjustments to the UCMJ, and the system increasingly resembled the federal criminal court process.

Court-Martial Proceedings

Military justice is administered in four tribunals. General courts-martial are the trial courts for major felonies and possess the greatest punitive powers, including capital punishment. Special courts-martial, some of which are empowered to impose a punitive discharge, can try and imprison offenders for no more than six months. Summary courts-martial can sentence enlisted service members to financial penalties, reduction in military grade, and confinement for no more than thirty days. Article 15 proceedings, called Non-Judicial Punishment, are an informal hearing before the offender's commander, who is limited to imposing financial and reduction of status penalties. Abolition of the draft in 1973 and a higher caliber of enlistees reduced the occurrence of offenses and almost eliminated use of special and summary courts-martial. Increasingly, misdemeanor infractions are resolved by Non-Judicial Punishment or by discharging the offender from the armed service. Only major offenses are tried at the general court-martial level.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading