Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that no person shall be tried for a serious crime “unless upon a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.” So named because it comprises a larger number of jurors than a trial or “petit” jury, a grand jury is “a jury of inquiry … whose duty it is to receive complaints and accusations in criminal cases, hear evidence adduced on the part of the state, and find bills of indictment in cases where they are satisfied a trial ought to be had” (Black 1983: 444). Because the grand jury can refuse to issue an indictment if it does not find probable cause to believe that a particular crime has been committed, it can be viewed as a “shield” that screens against unjust prosecutions. Because the grand jury can subpoena witnesses and documents, it can also be viewed as a “sword” that helps the prosecutor acquire evidence.

Background

The grand jury functions both to assist the prosecutor and to limit the prosecutor's discretion to take cases to trial. In part because these roles are in tension, and in part because grand jury proceedings and records are not public, far less is known about grand juries than about any other institution in the criminal justice process. The existing information, however, leads some commentators to say that grand juries are too effective in compelling the production of evidence and that they should be abolished.

England, where the grand jury first developed some 800 years ago, abolished it by an act of Parliament in 1933. Grand juries have never played a role outside the Anglo-American legal world.

Grand Jury Functions

The screening function, the “shield” against unjust prosecutions, is formally performed in every case, because before the grand jury can issue an indictment, it must find probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed the crime with which he or she is charged. If the grand jury does not find probable cause, the case is dismissed, although federal prosecutors can refile the same case and seek to persuade a different grand jury that there is sufficient evidence of the defendant's guilt.

Grand juries are selected in much the same way as trial juries: The names of citizens are drawn from those who own property, register to vote, or hold a driver's license. But grand juries function quite differently from trial juries. The grand jury can stay in session for as long as two years, usually meeting only one day a week, and can screen hundreds of cases. Trial juries decide guilt or innocence in a single case and must find proof beyond a reasonable doubt—a much higher standard than probable cause—before it can rule against the defendant. Federal grand juries consist of twenty-three members and can return an indictment by majority vote, while the trial jury consists of twelve members and must reach a unanimous verdict.

The only participants in the process who are in the grand jury room are the grand jurors, the prosecutor, and the witness. There is no judge, and more important, no defendant or defense lawyer to argue the other side of the case. Grand jurors, but not trial jurors, are permitted to ask questions of the witnesses and to discuss the case with the prosecutor. The proceedings are secret, the records are sealed, and no official report is ever made as to why the grand jury chose to indict or not to indict—although in political cases “leaks” are frequent.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading