Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Fear of crime is a complex phenomenon. It is also an important one, because how people feel about and react to crime is a major influence on how they lead their lives and how society deals with crime. Fear of crime involves a variety of emotional and judgmental responses to crime, and it includes one's fear of being a victim; fear that a family member, neighbor, or friend will be a victim; fear of property loss or damage; and one's assessment of the risk faced by oneself, significant others, or one's property. The general topic also includes a range of subjective states, from irrational responses to vague threats and media-driven anxiety to personal evaluations of the level of perceived threat or risk. During the past three decades, social scientists have done extensive research on assessing the fear of crime. Studying such a complex topic and the emotional reactions of people is a difficult task, and social scientists continue to debate the definition and conceptualization of fear of crime and struggle with how best to measure fear of crime in individuals and communities.

Measurement of Fear of Crime

The most common measurement of fear of crime used by researchers, especially in the early years of fear of crime research, uses national data sets or regional equivalents. Researchers adopt a single item question from either the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) or the General Social Survey (GSS) to measure fear of crime. The NCVS asks people, “How safe do you feel or would you feel being out alone in your neighborhood at night? During the day?” The GSS asks people, “Is there any area right around here—that is, within a mile or so—where you would be afraid to walk at night?” Both questions are very similar in style and intent and try to capture a generalized fear of crime in the person being interviewed.

Several researchers criticized this reliance on single-question data for its limited scope and its exclusion of a broader range of crimes. Although crimes that take place at night in public places (i.e., street crime) do provoke high levels of fear, many other situations that may occur during the day or at home or outside the neighborhood are overlooked. These limited questions lead to imprecision and potentially inaccurate conclusions, because general measures tend to mask variation in fear of crime across offenses, as well as possibly overestimating the level of fear in the general public.

More sophisticated approaches to measuring fear of crime focus on specific fears and the fear of harm caused by personal violence. This approach has greatly expanded the understanding that fear of crime is not universally distributed in response to different crimes. Further clarification was offered by identifying trust as an underlying factor in fear of crime. The work of Kenneth Ferraro (1995) and others reconceptualized fear of crime by differentiating fear from perceived risk and recognizing that risk is not a sufficient explanation in and of itself, but a necessary factor in the fear of crime equation. Relying primarily on a national sample, Ferraro explores the significance of both objective and perceived risk on fear of crime, suggesting that the fear of crime is mostly mediated through perceived risk of crime. and since people rely on local conditions, such as those in their neighborhood, to make judgments about personal risk, it follows that some social groups will perceive higher risks, and fear of crime will vary according to individual and situational factors.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading