Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In the modern era of criminal justice research, scholars have focused much attention on understanding how the personal choices of criminal justice professionals affect the processing of individuals through the justice system. Police, prosecutors, and judges all make decisions about how cases should be handled, and these decisions can result in different outcomes for individuals who are engaged in similar behavior. Since the mid-1900s, lawmakers and scholars have become increasingly concerned with the disparate treatment of offenders in the criminal justice system because such disparities threaten a principle of modern criminal justice—defendants, regardless of their personal characteristics, should be treated equally under the law. The American Bar Foundation Survey (1953) and the President's Crime Commission (1967) identified the informal and often unchecked discretionary decisions made throughout the criminal justice system as a cause of disparate treatment. During this same period, Kenneth Culp Davis (1969) published the influential book Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, which suggested that although discretion is a necessary part of the criminal justice system, it can become problematic when uncontrolled. Over the past four decades, courts and legislators have responded to the critique of discretion by instituting a number of reforms, including formal rules aimed at controlling discretionary decision making and reducing the potential for disparate treatment. These rules include well-known policies such as mandatory arrest procedures, sentencing guidelines, and mandatory minimum sentences.

Police Discretion

Criminologists, sociologists, and political scientists have devoted a significant amount of energy to the study of police behavior and decision making. As Walker (1993) argues, however, scholarly and political inquiries into the issue of discretionary decision making by the police have historically centered on problems of police misconduct rather than routine police activity. The study of police discretion is complex because police officers must make discretionary decisions at a variety of levels. For example, police officers routinely decide whom to stop, whom to question, whom to detain, and whom to arrest without formal guidance or approval from supervisors.

The majority of research on police discretion has focused on an officer's decision to make an arrest or give a citation. This research has consistently shown that although a number of factors affect an officer's decision to take formal action, the seriousness of the offense is the most significant legal factor found to increase the likelihood of arrest.

The widespread adoption of mandatory arrest policies in domestic violence incidents provides an interesting example of how policymakers have attempted to control police discretion about when an arrest is warranted. Until the 1970s, many police departments nationwide avoided making arrests in domestic violence incidents. Following a high-profile lawsuit in New York City, that city's police department adopted a policy that mandated arrests in domestic felony assault cases. The New York policy specifically stated that the marriage of the assaulting parties would not constitute a legitimate reason to refuse to arrest. As agencies began adopting mandatory arrest policies in response to domestic felony assault cases, the Police Foundation sponsored a study of mandatory arrests in Minneapolis that confirmed that arrest was more successful at deterring future violence than was either requiring mediation or separating the couple (Sherman and Berk 1984). Although the findings of the Minneapolis study have subsequently been challenged, police departments nationwide instituted mandatory arrest policies in cases of domestic violence. While assessment of the success of mandatory arrest policies in reducing future violence continues, little attention focuses on officer compliance with the policies or on evaluation of how the policies have changed police perceptions about the seriousness of domestic violence.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading