Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Differentiated case management (DCM) is a method intended to make the processing of court cases more effective. It is based on the notion that all cases are not alike and therefore should not be subject to the same processing events and schedules. Early in the court process, DCM programs sort cases by type of charge, type of offender, and expected disposition. Attempts are made to process less serious cases faster so that more time, resources, and effort can be saved for more serious cases. The goals of DCM are to move cases through the system faster and to make better use of scarce jail space. DCM has the potential to reduce prosecution delays in courts in the United States. These delays can lead to several problems. First, delays can interfere with a defendant's right to a speedy trial. Second, delays can contribute to severe overcrowding in jails and detention centers. Third, delays caused by the vast increase of drug cases leave fewer resources to handle the more serious or violent felony cases. For example, if certain details involving a serious case are overlooked because of insufficient resources, the chances are greater that an innocent person may be incarcerated or that a violent criminal may remain free. Therefore, if DCM is found to be effective, its use could improve the administration of justice, alleviate jail crowding, and better ensure that incarceration is reserved for the most serious offenders.

Background and Issues

Since the early 1980s, increased public and political concern in the United States over drug abuse (mainly heroin and cocaine) and its related crime, along with a conservative political movement, has led to a greater emphasis on increased punishment for offenders—especially those who sell and possess illegal drugs. Although this emphasis, along with many other factors, appeared to have contributed to a reduction in violent crime during the mid- to late 1990s, it has led to dramatic increases in the number of court cases and to the numbers of adult prisoners, parolees, and probationers. Because of these circumstances, researchers, policy makers, and judges wanted to develop methods of processing that would move cases through the system quickly while maintaining defendants' legal and constitutional rights.

Effectiveness of Dcm

The effectiveness of DCM has been evaluated with respect to different types of outcomes. Most studies have compared DCM to standard case processing (in which court cases are not classified by charge type, offender type, or expected disposition) with respect to the average time to disposition. The most common method used in these studies has been to compare DCM processing with standard case processing in a neighboring jurisdiction over the same time period. Results of such comparisons have favored DCM over standard case processing.

Case Processing Studies

An American Bar Association (ABA) study published in 1991 involving Chicago, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia reported that the average time to disposition for drug cases using DCM was about 2 to 3.5 times shorter than the time for drug cases using standard processing. With regard to nondrug cases, DCM processing was found to be 1.3 to 1.5 times faster than standard processing. However, in Philadelphia and Chicago, quicker dispositions were associated with more lenient sentencing. Similarly, in a 1994 study of New Brunswick, New Jersey, drug cases, Joan Jacoby found that DCM cases took an average of 81 days to disposition, whereas cases processed using standard procedures took 191 days. Finally, in the only comparison involving juvenile court cases, Sheldon Zhang's 1996 report described a centralized juvenile justice facility in Los Angeles in which all agencies—the prosecutor, public defender, and social services—were housed under one roof. The average time to disposition under the centralized system was somewhat shorter than that under the conventional system −67 versus 90 days. However, Zhang also noted that use of the centralized system did not reduce reoffending.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading