Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In order to understand and identify crime and criminal behavior, investigators collect and classify certain information. The information collected is called “data.” The collection of data serves three main purposes: to test theories about the causes of crime, to increase knowledge about certain offenses and offenders, and to assist with public policy development. After data are collected, they must be classified to compare offenses and offenders across jurisdictions.

One of the earliest criminal classification systems, developed in the latter part of the eighteenth century, was designed to differentiate criminals from noncriminals by physical appearance. As the study of crime and criminality evolved, other scientific disciplines, such as psychology, biology, and sociology, developed their own approaches to criminal classification. These approaches primarily focused on the behaviors or predisposition of offenders to explain the causes of crime. In defining which behaviors would be subject to public sanction, legislatures developed their own classification of criminal offenses. In the United States, although the definition and classification of criminal offenses may differ from state to state, many jurisdictions have adopted some form of the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code, which defines and distinguishes crimes. Today, the principal sources of aggregate crime data in the United States are the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports and the Bureau of the Census's National Crime Victimization Survey. Refinements to the classification systems contained in these instruments have helped researchers expand their knowledge of offenses and offenders. Also, the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute has conducted the International Crime Victim Survey in fifty-six countries to standardize measurement of crime rates and trends across national borders.

Historical Background

In the view of many who study crime and criminality, one of the main reasons to collect information about crime is to test the theories about its cause. This approach dates back to the mid-1800s, when August Comte (1798–1857), a French sociologist, suggested that knowledge and understanding in social science can advance only if the scientific (positivist) principles of the natural sciences are applied.

A number of disciplines, particularly biology, psychology, and sociology, have studied crime and criminality. Researchers in each of these disciplines have viewed crime from their own perspective, suggesting that their perspective may provide the identification the cause of crime. Researchers have classified offenders from within their frame of reference. As a result, a variety of criminal classifications have developed within the various disciplines.

Biological Classification

Although criminology as a discipline can trace its philosophical roots to the treatise On Crimes and Punishments by Cesare Beccaria (1738–1794), the scientific examination of crime and criminal behavior began with the publication of L'Uomo Delinquente (“The Criminal Man,” 1876) by Cesare Lombroso (1835–1909). Lombroso, a physician by training, established a classification system that distinguished criminals from noncriminals. About one-third of all criminals, he said, are “born criminal.” Lombroso contended that these individuals could be identified by their physical appearance. They possess physical characteristics that are atavistic, that is, more representative of humans at an earlier stage of evolutionary development. A large jaw, strong teeth, wide arm span, flat nose, and high cheek bones are a few of the physical anomalies identified by Lombroso as being common to criminals. A person born with five or more of these physical features, which he termed stigmata, is predisposed toward criminal behavior. In addition to the born criminal, Lombroso identified two additional categories of criminals: the insane and criminoloids. Insane criminals become unable to distinguish between right and wrong as a result of some mental disturbance. Criminoloids, who account for about one-half of the criminal population, may possess some of the same physical characteristics as the “born criminal,” but their defining anomalies are psychological rather than physical.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading