Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Few academic theories have garnered as much attention from such a diverse audience as has broken windows theory. Supporters and critics of the theory include attorneys, politicians, police, scholars, journalists, and representatives of myriad other disciplines. When introduced, it was a simple, elegant theory that held great promise. That promise was to accomplish what no previous theory had accomplished: to bring down soaring crime rates. James Q. Wilson and George Kelling used broken windows as a metaphor for disorder within neighborhoods. Their theory links disorder and incivility within a community to subsequent occurrences of serious crime.

Broken windows theory had an enormous impact on police policy throughout the 1990s and will remain influential. Perhaps the most notable application of the theory was in New York City under the direction of Police Commissioner William Bratton. He and many others are convinced that the aggressive order-maintenance practices of the New York Police Department were responsible for the dramatic decrease in crime rates within the city during the 1990s. Bratton began translating the theory into practice as the Chief of New York City's transit police from 1990 to 1992. He saw fare evasion as the “biggest broken window in the transit system” (Bratton and Knobler 1998). Squads of plainclothes officers were assigned to catch turnstile jumpers. They soon discovered that many of these fare evaders were carrying illegal weapons or had outstanding arrest warrants. As arrests for misdemeanors increased, subway crimes of all kinds decreased dramatically. In 1994, when he became New York City Police Commissioner, Bratton introduced his broken windows–based “quality of life initiative.” This initiative cracked down on panhandling, disorderly behavior, public drinking, street prostitution, and unsolicited windshield washing by “squeegee people.” The quality of life initiative, combined with other innovative policies, was credited with reducing felonies by 27 percent in the first two years.

The Theory

Prior to the development and implementation of various incivility theories such as broken windows, police practitioners and scholars tended to focus on serious crime. That is, the major concern was with crimes that were perceived as the most serious and consequential to the victim, such as rape, robbery, and murder. This reactive strategy was losing the war on crime, because when serious crime occurred, the underlying cause was already having a major effect. Wilson and Kelling took a different view; they saw serious crime as the final result of a lengthier chain of events. They theorized that crime emanated from disorder and that if disorder is eliminated, then serious crimes will not occur.

A stable neighborhood of families who care for their homes, mind each other's children, and confidently frown on unwanted intruders can change, in a few years or even a few months, to an inhospitable and frightening jungle. A piece of property is abandoned, weeds grow up, a window is smashed. Adults stop scolding rowdy children; the children, emboldened, become more rowdy. Families move out, unattached adults move in. Teenagers gather in front of the corner store. The merchants ask them to move; they refuse. Fights occur. Litter accumulates. People start drinking in front of the grocer's; in time, an inebriate slumps to the sidewalk and is allowed to sleep it off. Pedestrians are approached by panhandlers. (1982: 32)

The response of citizens to disorder ultimately leads to serious crime in the community. The prevalence of disorder creates fear in the minds of citizens who are convinced that the area is unsafe. “Responding prudently, and fearful, citizens will stay off streets, avoid certain areas, and curtail their normal activities and associations” (Kelling and Coles 1996: 20). This withdrawal from the community weakens social controls that previously kept criminals in check. Once this process begins, it feeds itself. Disorder causes crime, and crime causes further disorder and crime in what Wesley Skogan has characterized as a “spiral of decay.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading