Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Sexual harassment remains a common occupational hazard for women. It is estimated that over half of all women will experience some form of sexual harassment during college and/or their working lives. Women in male-dominated workplaces, in blue-collar jobs, or who are marginalized due to their race, sexual orientation, or social class often experience higher rates of sexual harassment than the general population. Although the vast majority of all sexual harassment cases involve men harassing women, there are also cases of men being sexually harassed. These cases usually involve same-sex harassment, where a man is targeted as a form of hazing or for perceived violations of hypermasculine gender role stereotypes. Sexual harassment is both prevalent and harmful for targets and the organizations within which they work. Once harassed, individuals, whether male or female, report a variety of negative outcomes related to their work, health, and psychological well-being. Across a spectrum of outcome measures, harassed men and women fair more poorly than those without a history of harassment. Specifically, research has documented detriment to the job satisfaction, work productivity, supervisor satisfaction, absenteeism, and turnover rates of harassed employees—the costs of which can reach billions of dollars annually for federal and private institutions. The psychological and health-related costs are equally high, with targets reporting numerous symptoms, such as depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and health problems following harassment. Despite the contributions of individual and sociocultural factors, organizations have many strategies at their disposal to reduce the prevalence of sexual harassment within their institutions. These efforts will not only protect employees from the harm of harassment, but also limit employers' legal liability. Ultimately, an equitable work environment that is free of harassment benefits everyone within the institution.

Definitions

In 1980, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission identified sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination that commonly manifests as either a hostile work environment or quid pro quo. Hostile work environment refers to an environment where sexual harassment is pervasive, and an employee believes that the general workplace milieu has become hostile and/or the ability to do his or her job has been compromised. Quid pro quo can be a single or a recurrent event(s) where an employee is pressured to engage in sexual behaviors due to job-related threats or benefits.

Social scientists define sexual harassment as any unwanted gender-based behavior that is offensive to the target, threatens the target's well-being, and/or overwhelms his or her coping abilities. Subtypes of sexual harassment have also been identified. Gender harassment includes a variety of sexist comments or behaviors that are often nonsexual in nature, such as asserting that all women are incompetent or unable to perform certain occupational duties. Unwanted sexual attention includes sexual comments, gestures, or physical contact, such as repeated requests for dates or attempts to kiss or touch the target. Sexual coercion is equivalent to the legal definition of quid pro quo and includes any job-related threats or benefits that are used to coerce sexual interaction, such as promises that an employee will be promoted or fired based on sexual compliance. Finally, contrapower sexual harassment involves any form of sexual harassment perpetrated by a subordinate and targeting a superior.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading