Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Personality assessment, in its broadest sense, includes any technique that is used to describe or make inferences about the characteristic traits, attitudes, beliefs, values, needs, motives, emotional states, coping styles, or aspirations of an individual. Personality assessment can take many forms, including an Internet dating questionnaire, an epitaph, a letter of recommendation, a psychodiagnosis, an integrity test administered as part of an employment application, and a psychobiography based on a historical record.

For the present purposes, however, three major functions of personality assessment will be considered: assessment in the service of basic research and theory explication; assessment in applied psychology, including therapeutic, organizational, and forensic settings; and assessment in self-exploration. These different functions of personality assessment determine the personality characteristics to be measured and the instrument or method to be used.

What to Measure: The Content of Personality

Personality characteristics constitute a fuzzy set, populated by constructs as diverse as extraversion, physical attractiveness, creativity, sexual orientation, gender, and psychopathology. Yet there is some consensus, for at its core, personality is now generally conceptualized at three strata or levels of analysis. In parallel with these three levels of analysis, three goals of personality assessment can be described. The most ambitious of these is understanding, followed by explanation, then description and prediction.

Narrative Accounts

The deepest of the three strata is the life story, a set of meanings that unfolds over time and which can be linked into a narrative account. The outstanding characteristic of the life story is its individuality. Assessment at this level is aimed at an abstract understanding of the person, and typically occurs in specialized contexts such as case studies, biographies, and epitaphs. The narrative account can serve as an implicit criterion against which respondents evaluate the validity of more shallow and more quantitative assessments of personality.

Characteristic Adaptations

Characteristic adaptations represent a heterogeneous middle level of analysis. These include motives and related mechanisms such as coping and defensive styles, and cognitive factors such as schemas, plans, generalized expectancies, and beliefs. Characteristic adaptations also include developmental constructs such as stage of personality development. A prominent measure at this level is the Washington University Sentence Completion Test, a measure of ego development. Given the heterogeneity of this level, assessment of characteristic adaptations serves many functions. For heuristic purposes, however, the primary reason for assessing characteristic adaptations is to achieve an explanation of why behavior does or does not occur.

Traits

The most accessible and easily quantified level of personality is that of the trait or disposition. The primary objective when assessing personality traits or dispositions is the description and prediction of behavior.

The Meaning of Traits

Traits, the primary unit of personality description, are relatively enduring ways in which individuals differ. Assessment at the level of traits is variable centered and nomothetic, focusing on differences among individuals, as opposed to the person-centered and idio-graphic approach that focuses on individuals, and that typically characterizes assessment at deeper and more abstract levels of personality.

Because people differ in many ways, psychologists must decide which differences are worthy of study. While evolutionary, psychoanalytic, and behavioral perspectives have been influential in suggesting traits that are worthy of attention when assessing personality, a more pragmatic, data-driven approach has generally held sway. At the most basic level, trait attributions are made based upon simple summaries of past behavior, and because what has happened in the past is likely to recur, traits can serve as valid predictors of future behaviors. Beyond this summary approach, if one takes into account characteristics of the situation as well, traits can help explain behavior and contribute to an understanding of the person. For example, an observation that “Jane has panic attacks in crowds” might lead to an inference of the form that “Jane will not go to the party because she is agoraphobic.” Trait attributions can and frequently do go beyond the trivial and tautological.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading