Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A child custody evaluation, also known as a parental responsibility evaluation, is a process by which recommendations are made to a family court with respect to the best interests of a child. They may include responses to parents' requests for parenting time or access to their children as well as evaluations of who should have decision-making authority regarding the child's education, health care, and religion. Such evaluations are performed by qualified mental health professionals who have been appointed or recognized by a family court or by privately qualified mental health professionals. Typically, the need for such an evaluation arises where there has been a high-conflict divorce; where there are accusations regarding one or both parents' parenting practices; where there are concerns about a parent's mental health problem, child abuse, or substance use or abuse; where the primary care parent is relocating, or in any other circumstances that may have a negative impact on the child's best interest. While divorce rates in the United States remain high, about 90% of child custody disputes are settled out of court. The remaining 10% often involve protracted litigation.

Historical Perspectives

From colonial times until about the middle of the 1800s, child custody decisions were based upon British common law. These laws were gender biased and gave custody to fathers based upon paternal entitlement. This practice continued until around the time of the Industrial Revolution, when women's groups began protesting these laws. By the 1880s, most states had adopted the tender-years doctrine for custody decisions. The tender-years doctrine basically stated that when all other factors are equal, children under the age of 13 should reside with their mothers. If fathers wanted to retain custody, they had to prove that the mother was unfit or had committed adultery. The fitness of parents was heavily influenced by the perceived morality of the time. This often resulted in discrimination against homosexual or cohabiting parents.

Starting in the mid-1960s, the best-interest doctrine was adopted as a gender-neutral, child-centered model for custody decisions. The Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act, passed in 1974, attempted to standardize best-interest criteria. The criteria included consideration of the wishes of the parents and child, the physical and mental health of all parties, parent-child interactions, the child's adjustment in multiple areas of life, and any special matters relevant to parental fitness. The first joint custody statute was passed in North Carolina in 1957, but due to lack of a favorable reception, records show shared parenting rulings were not widely recognized until the 1980s. Recent studies by the American Bar Association have shown that the number of sole custody decisions has decreased dramatically since that time, and joint custody is a far more common outcome. In most cases, permanent physical custody is awarded to the parent with whom the child will live the majority of the time. The custodial parent will have joint custody with the noncustodial parent, and they will share important decisions related to matters such as health care and education. In most cases the courts will also order scheduled visitation or temporary custody to the noncustodial parent.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading