Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

THE FEDERAL MAIL fraud statute is codified under 18 USC §1341, and has two essential elements: 1) use of the United States mail; 2) use that is in furtherance of defrauding someone. The law has been utilized in diverse cases by federal prosecutors in pursuing everything from simple confidence games to bribery of public officials. §1341 has been used against virtually every new method of fraud, and sometimes has been the only way to prosecute and adequately punish sophisticated fraudsters. Despite the broad application and peculiar elements that give §1341 great prosecutorial power, those characteristics also place it in jeopardy of inappropriate and abusive usages.

Its offspring statute, wire fraud (18 USC §1343), is in almost all cases interpreted similarly to §1341. Mail fraud encompasses the use of the mails, either inter- or intrastate, whereas wire fraud outlaws the interstate use of wires for fraudulent purposes. Federal jurisdiction of both mail and wire fraud originate in the Constitution under Article 1, Section 8. However, mail fraud is based on Congress's control of the postal authorities and wire fraud is based on Congress's right to make laws affecting interstate and foreign commerce.

Mail fraud may be seen as more specific to the federal jurisdiction than wire fraud because its overt act is any use of the mails, which are owned and operated by the government, as a necessary means to complete the fraud scheme. Wire fraud, on the other hand, involves wires owned by entities other than the federal government, so federal jurisdiction is, like many federal offenses, based only on the Commerce Clause.

Instruments of Crime

The underlying legal crime of mail fraud is not that associated with the scam, but rather the crime in using the mails, or trying to use them, as an instrument of defrauding the mail recipients. This allows extremely distinctive enforcement interpretations. First, the statute is completely unconcerned with the harm inflicted by the fraud. Second, the culpability structure of §1341 is much more inclusive than almost all other criminal offenses because the statute allows merely a “scheme” to be prosecuted, regardless of whether the scheme actually took place or was successful.

The interpretation is, in this sense, similar to a conspiracy to commit a crime, but a conspiracy necessitates at least two participants; there need be only one participant in the scheme to be prosecuted under mail fraud. Further, whereas conspiracy can be charged only once regardless of the number of separate overt acts committed as a result of the conspiracy, mail fraud law punishes each act of mailing as a separate count. Third, the intent to violate §1341 only need involve a broadly interpreted “foreseeable” use of the mails; most offenses require that the perpetrator have knowledge of the commission of the act and also intended its commission.

In 1994, Congress added to §1341 the use of common carriers to execute a fraud, and added financial institution victims in 1989. The maximum penalty for mail fraud affecting a financial institution was raised from 20 years to 30 years in 1990. The current §1341 is titled “Frauds and Swindles” and spells out the statute (albeit

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading