Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

THE TERMS bribery and graft are often used when referring to kickbacks. Kickbacks are monetary and non-monetary benefits that are paid to gain influence over and profit from an individual or firm. They are widespread and often accepted as a cost of doing business in many segments of the economy at home and abroad. Indeed, there are some segments of the economy that are more susceptible to the kickbacks, and the practice is more prevalent within some occupations. Those often cited among those most susceptible are elected officials and police officers.

James W. Coleman notes that, in cases of commercial bribery, it is often argued that the amount paid in bribes is relatively small relative to the prof its, and consumers bear little of the actual costs. However, the widespread practice of kickbacks gives an unfair advantage to large companies with the resources to defray the costs relative to smaller competitors. According to Coleman, companies are able to avoid the accounting problems that arise from bribes extended in the form of cash, stocks, bonds or other forms of monetary or non-monetary forms of payment by establishing dummy firms to absorb the cost. Another means of disguising kickbacks as a legitimate business expense occurs when multinational firms, unable to establish local offices, distribute payoffs through local sales agents. Firms find this an especially efficient way of conducting business because local agents are more knowledgeable about which local entities need to receive “gifts” according to cultural and structural norms. Moreover, once the sales agent is paid, multinational firms are able to plead ignorance of how money is subsequently distributed and for what purposes.

Government Kickbacks

Bureaucratic departments and agencies are particularly susceptible to kickbacks because the government does not manufacture the products that it needs. Instead, contracts for materials and services are issued to businesses in the private sector. Officeholders are able to ensure their own financial gain through tactics such as awarding inflated contracts which then “kick back” the amount by which the contract has been inflated to the officeholders responsible for extending the contract.

Charles H. McCaghy notes another means through which kickbacks have been distributed is through donations to party campaign coffers. Contracts are extended to firms with the unspoken agreement that a voluntary campaign contribution will be forthcoming. Other times, officials might leak the amount of bids for government contracts to their preferred firms who are then able to seemingly win a contract by issuing the lowest bid.

That elected officials are particularly susceptible to the lure of kickbacks, often seeking them out, raises important questions not only about the honesty and integrity of elected officials, but also about their commitment to representing the interests of constituents. Kickbacks to politicians highlight the susceptibility of a political system to the interests of those most able to pay. Dishonesty on the part of elected officials contributes to an atmosphere of corruption and undermines the strength of laws. What makes a kickback to public officials more insidious is the inherent difficulty in determining the extent to which individual decision-makers are swayed.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading