Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

ALTHOUGH MODERN capitalism began emerging in the 15th and 16th centuries when international trading became lucrative for Western nations and private enterprise, the new economic world order emerged about 40 years ago.

This new world order is referred to as post-capitalism or globalization. Both terms refer to a set of social, political, economic, and cultural dynamics leading to the development of shared cultures internationally via the internet, the growth of transnational corporations across national boundaries and trade agreements via the European Union (EU), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Tariff and Trades (GATT) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

By the mid-1990s these trade agreements increased the U.S. control of the world market from 25 percent to 50 percent. The WTO, created during the 1994 Uruguay Round of the GATT, has members who are not elected but appointed, yet control virtually all trade on the planet. As bureaucratic trade specialists representing each nation, their only goal is to represent each country's economic interests. With a two-thirds vote the WTO can change existing international trade rules without referring to nationally elected legislatures. Furthermore, member states can challenge other states' laws for being protectionist of domestic industry or discriminatory against imports.

Similarly, NAFTA actually allows transnational corporations themselves to sue nations for violating free trade rights. The absence of an effective and enforceable body of international law leaves this undemocratic system unchecked, and the ensuing economic inequality often transforms into racial, ethnic, and religious-based hatred and sometimes even genocide.

Financing Globalization

Free trade or cheap trade is facilitated by a variety of international financial institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These institutions loan money to developing nations under specific conditions that often dismantle state-run industries and eliminate state-run social, work, and health programs thus harming local citizens while increasing the profits of the transnational companies.

Thus, some economists say historical colonialism and jingoism now exist under the guise of Western loans through the World Bank, IMF structural adjustment programs and multinational corporate exploitation of third world nations through the WTO. Liberalized trade laws and a skewed decision-making structure benefited wealthy nations and transnational corporations while harming less developed and industrial nations. This global structure tolerates repressive regimes, forces population movements, and facilitates genocide, destroys the environment, and violates the human rights of indigenous peoples while damaging health and social welfare programs.

For example, in 1992, the U.S. corporation Occidental Petroleum muscled a deal with the state of Colombia to drill an oil well on the reservation land of the indigenous U'wa people, destroying their land and usurping their power. Similarly in Nigeria, the Ogoni people, an indigenous ethnic minority, have been the victims of a corrupt alliance between the state and Shell Oil Company since 1958, when Shell began exploiting oil and natural gas reserves leading to oil spills, and air and groundwater pollution. Finally, in Ecuador, ARCO, Shell, and Texaco—preceded by the rubber companies in the early 20th century—have used violence and debt bondage to exploit the labor and land of indigenous tribes. Since 1970, this type of corporate colonization has displaced 18,000 people from 247,000 acres of land in Ecuador.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading