Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

THE TERM caveat emptor derives from the Latin, meaning “let the buyer beware.” It is employed as a warning to consumers that, if they are not vigilant, they are likely to be bilked by any one of thousands of ravenous marketplace predators; be they homerepair salesman, stock market shills, those who offer CDs at bargain rates, or others of the hordes of fraudulent vendors. The issue is whether governmental groups ought to provide protection for unwary consumers or whether they ought to be left to look out for themselves and suffer the consequences.

The popularity of the term caveat emptor is seen in the 28,000 entries that can be retrieved from Yahoo! on the internet. Virtually all of the internet links contain warnings about the perils of one or another scam that is being perpetrated on an unknowing public.

Because of its linguistic roots in Latin, caveat emptor often is mistakenly assumed to be a product of Roman law. Actually, it first was used in Angloamerican treatises in the 18th century with the introduction of industrialization and mercantilism. Walton Hamilton, a Yale University law professor, pointed out that the idea of caveat emptor was created by businessmen on the pretense that there existed a long tradition that required purchasers to be wary.

It was claimed that such an arrangement made for a more alert and more intelligent buying public. But Hamilton demonstrates that this viewpoint was based largely on misinterpretations of old documents. In truth, Hamilton suggests, Roman law and English common law were notably protective of the consumer.

Whatever slight legitimacy the caveat emptor principle might ever have enjoyed, it makes little sense in a very complex world in which it has become impossible for a customer to evaluate the adequacy of what is being offered. It may have been possible for farmers to appreciate that a horse said to be seven years old was twice that age. But how many of us can tell if pajamas are dangerously flammable or that a house being purchased has structural flaws not visible to the naked eye?

Because of the increased complexity of human existence, caveat emptor has been severely limited and increasing liability for misrepresentation has been placed on sellers. The legal responsibility of those purveying products has come to be labeled caveat venditor, let the seller beware.

Securities Fraud

In one area of concern, securities laws exemplify the tendency to impose penalties for fraudulent stock market transactions. The story begins with the chartering of the South Sea Company in London in 1711, one of the first corporations to sell shares. The price of the stock surged wildly through shrewd word-of-mouth advertising, creating a speculative mania. The price was 73 when the stock first was issued; about nine years later is was selling for nearly 2,000. When the stock tumbled dramatically, King George I observed that the swindle had involved “ensnaring and defrauding unwary persons to their utter impoverishment and ruin.” An investigatory committee found evidence of bribes to members of Parliament and other unsavory tactics to artificially inflate the company's market value artificially. Restrictive laws were enacted to control the selling of corporate shares.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading