Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

IN MAY 2002, Stanley Works Inc., a Connecticutbased tool-making company, reincorporated in Bermuda, joining the recent list of U.S. firms (Fruit of the Loom, Ingersoll-Rand, and Tyco) “relocating” to escape taxes. The issue was prominently featured in the news and sparked a supposed outcry from politicians who claimed such moves were unpatriotic. Importantly, the issues of tax avoidance, tax evasion, as well as the concerns regarding offshore havens, date back generations. The Caribbean has been the focus in much of this history.

In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt received a report on tax evasion from Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Roosevelt forwarded the document to Congress with this message: “Efforts at avoidance and evasion of tax liability [are] so widespread and so amazing both in their boldness and their ingenuity that further action without delay seems imperative.” In response, the 75th Congress created the Joint Committee on Tax Evasion and Avoidance. Morgenthau's report to Roosevelt listed the major and unprecedented devices used to beat the income tax.

Number one was the creation of “foreign personal holding corporations in the Bahamas, Panama, Newfoundland, and other places where taxes are low and corporation laws lax.” Morgenthau pointed out the difficulty of gathering information on Bahamian companies (owned by Americans) that are “organized through foreign lawyers, with dummy incorporators and dummy directors, so that the names of the real parties in interest do not appear.” In testimony before the Congressional Joint Committee, Morgenthau castigated the many “ingenious lawyers and accountants” who were very well paid to construct immoral methods for their clients to avoid taxes.

In 1961, the Internal Revenue Service's Audit Division prepared a pamphlet for internal use prompted by many signs that schemes for the evasion of taxes were multiplying. These depended largely on the use of controlled foreign corporations, partnerships, or trusts. It was becoming clear that money was being funneled at an increasing pace to offshore countries and newly formed companies in order to avoid domestic taxes. The pamphlet's first example dealt with currency moving through Panama and the Netherlands Antilles. Another illustration featured the Bahamas. In this case, the culprit was quaintly described as “Mr. X, the cunning taxpayer.” The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) calculated he owed about $10 million in taxes and penalties. Interest in this was so new, however, that the IRS felt the need to provide 15 “clues” for agents to alert them to these plots. “Keep watch,” agents were informed, for signs such as a license to operate in a foreign country; a domestic corporation borrowing from a foreign corporation; the liquidation of foreign corporations; and the transfer of assets to a foreign corporation.

Thirty years after the first Congressional hearing on tax evasion through the use of off-shore companies, an attorney told IRS Special Agents attempting to untangle his enterprise:

There is nothing more corrupting to our society than a system of taxation. I have no words strong enough to condemn the society in which we are living in terms of taxation. He (the taxpayer) puts money in a Bahama central trust. Why in the Bahamas? There is no income tax or estate tax in the Bahamas. Why in a trust? A trust is like a corporation, a separate legal entity. This separate entity is a non-resident alien, and a non-resident alien can sell an asset in the United States with no tax. How delightful! Now, if that non-resident alien ties in with a distributing company in the Netherlands Antilles, which can earn interest in the United States without a tax under any circumstances, he has put together a perfect set-up. He takes losses and deductions in the United States and he takes gains and profits abroad, under a tax treaty. Do you think any Congress we have is going to change the laws that allow this? Let's not kid ourselves. With those savings, the rich of this country can afford to buy the entire Senate, if necessary.

Ten years later, the U.S. Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) concluded “that the use of so-called ‘secret’ offshore facilities has become so pervasive that it challenges basic assumptions regarding the ability of federal and state authorities to enforce the laws.” Furthermore, according to the PSI, some Caribbean nations were so corrupted that they essentially offered themselves as crime havens.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading