Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The histories of consumption and waste management in modern Britain are inseparable. Personal consumption has always generated some measure of household waste, and particularly in urban societies, its unregulated presence became an ever-increasing problem over time. As towns grew larger and more densely populated in the 19th century, even the relatively poor populations of British cities generated problematic quantities of waste, whose presence was increasingly seen as threatening public health. Systematic efforts to manage the problem began in earnest in 1868 with the passage of the Public Health Act, which set in motion a nationwide movement to improve sanitation and reduce illness. The legislation empowered local government authorities to provide the infrastructures needed to collect and dispose of house wastes and to recover the costs through local taxation. There was no attempt to regulate the generation of refuse per se, but the legislation did recognize that there was a fundamental duality in the nature of waste: although it was an undesirable nuisance, it also potentially had value. Ownership of collected refuse was thus vested in the authorities who were given the right to sell it, or process it for sale, using the income to offset service costs. Municipalities were quick to employ their discretionary powers. By the end of the century, most cities had in place comprehensive measures for dealing with urban trash. Many of them established organizational structures and procedures to sort and reclaim materials for sale, and by the start of World War I in 1914, the largest cities, such as London, Birmingham, and Glasgow, had large and often sophisticated operations for processing the growing amounts of byproducts of consumption.

Public Cleansing

It would be misleading to paint too glowing a picture of early-20th-century waste management, or “public cleansing,” as it was then known. Judged by later standards, it was still a relatively crude and unregulated process. Even so, it was generally an organized activity that focused exclusively on dealing with whatever refuse was generated. Both local politicians and the emerging professional class of practitioners who managed the services saw their task as carrying out this work using or developing the most efficient methods possible for managing a steadily growing quantity of urban rubbish. That growth was fueled by an expanding population, where poverty was diminishing and consumption was starting to increase. Even though that increased consumption was initially largely confined to the basics of life, it generated extra household refuse, which had both financial and physical impacts on cities. Birmingham, Britain's second-largest city in 1900 with a population of 650,000, saw its household waste output rise by over 11 percent between 1900 and 1915, from 202,658 tons to 225,647 tons, and costs rose even more, with increases amounting to almost 44 percent over the same period. Recycling, or salvage, was important for reducing outlays on the service and in Birmingham's case, saved almost 10 percent annually. Waste was an ever-increasing problem, the successful management of which was judged not just by levels of efficiency in its collection and disposal but also by the extent to which the service conformed to budgets that were often based more on political considerations than on what practitioners considered necessary.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading