Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Producer responsibility involves integrating the environmental costs associated with goods throughout their life cycles into the market price of the products. The ultimate goal is to reduce the quantity of waste, increase recycling, and achieve more environmentally sound product development. This is particularly salient in environmentally hazardous industries such as packaging, wastepaper, tires, batteries, and electric and electronic products.

Voluntary commitments on producer responsibility in three product groups—office paper, agricultural plastic, and building and demolition waste—have shown signs of success, given that material recovery has increased in all three groups. Producer responsibility for packaging has not resulted in a decrease in the total quantities of packaging. Nevertheless, the quantity of packaging per pound of article has reduced primarily because of lighter packaging materials. Coordinating information between producers and local authorities has also been shown to improve recycling results and raise the level of awareness of service in collection systems.

Extended Producer Responsibility

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a pollution prevention policy that focuses on product systems, rather than on production facilities. It is based on the premise that the primary responsibility of waste generated during the production process and after the product is discarded is that of the producer.

The history of EPR laws can be dated back to the mid-1970s in Sweden, when the government mandated the recycling of aluminum cans. In 1982, the government further threatened to ban the use of these cans for carrying beer and soft drinks unless there was a system for recycling 75 percent of them by 1985. After trying and failing with several recycling schemes, including curbside recycling programs, the aluminum industry tried a deposit/refund system, which enabled recycling rates to increase to 92 percent in about 10 years. Germany's Ordinance on the Avoidance of Packaging Waste was passed in 1991 and is one of the best-known EPR mandates. However, the earliest form of the EPR system was the deposit refund system for refillable soft drink and beer bottles initiated by the beverage industry in the United States nearly 100 years ago.

The main goal of EPR is sustainable development via environmentally responsible product development and recovery. In most cases, manufacturers do not bear responsibility for products after a sale. The product is disposed of after use, since manufacturers do not design things that can be easily repaired, recycled, refurbished, upgraded, and reused in order to encourage product obsolescence and higher sales for their newer models. However, governments in many countries are increasingly adopting EPR laws that mandate companies to take back and assume responsibility for the products that they sell, from television sets to ink cartridges. The assumption is that holding producers accountable for the waste and pollution will force them to incorporate a broader range of environmental considerations into both the product design as well as choice of materials, hence reducing consumption of resources at the different stages of the life cycle of the product or packaging.

The overarching goal is to encourage manufacturers to assess the full life cycle of their products. This will then force them to rethink and redesign their products so as to eliminate unnecessary parts, do away with unnecessary packaging, and design products that can be easily disassembled, recycled, remanufactured, or reused.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading