Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Nuclear energy is a paradox. It is both a high-tech industry and extraction based, with the strengths and weaknesses of both. It is one of the most debated, analyzed, and policy-driven issues in the 21st century, but it is also one of the most vaguely defined. It is considered by some to be the cleanest energy source in the world and by others to be the dirtiest. It is both a weapon that can potentially destroy mankind and a source of potentially perpetual industry.

For the first part of its history, the threat of nuclear war and, later, nonproliferation overshadowed nuclear waste disposal. Since some radioactive wastes have half-lives of one million years or longer, most waste was placed in above-ground storage in the hope that a disposal solution would be found within the next 100 years. Some of the first high-level nuclear waste was 60 years old as of 2010, and many nuclear power plants, like many older manufacturing facilities around the world, are reaching the end of their operating lives. Some countries are dealing with leftover radioactive waste from decommissioned cold war–era nuclear missiles. While nuclear technology has advanced, nuclear waste disposal still remains a waiting game of keeping it as far from humans as possible until it is not toxic. When many countries built nuclear reactors, they expected that their nuclear fuel would be reprocessed and stored in a foreign country. As the world becomes increasingly crowded, it becomes more difficult to find places to handle and store potentially harmful waste. In the 21st century, several new ways of disposing of high-level nuclear waste are being developed, and many countries have begun to reprocess or recycle nuclear waste. The biggest challenge is not only technical but also political and societal because of competing beliefs, goals, and impacts. Nuclear waste and the subsequent issues of storage are as diverse as the policy debates on the issue. To fully comprehend the implications of the latter, one must first have a basic understanding of the former. Nuclear waste can be delineated into three categories: extraction waste, low-level waste, and high-level waste.

Extraction Waste or Milling Waste

Extraction waste, or milling waste, is a by-product of uranium mining. Waste of this sort comes from the extraction of the uranium ore from the Earth and the subsequent process of concentrating it into yellow-cake uranium. National or regional regulatory agencies like the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), France's Agence nationale pour la gestion des dechets radioactif, or the International Commission on Radiation Protection often regulate both the processes of extraction (to what degree depends on the process used) and waste management. Uranium mining can be broken down into two categories. The first, conventional mining, is the process of removing uranium from the Earth via underground shafts or open pits. The second category is in situ recovery, also known as solution mining, which chemically alters the uranium by pumping a solution, usually made up of water mixed with hydrogen peroxide or oxygen, called lixiviant, through a series of wells. This process causes the ore to dissolve into the solution, which is then pumped to a series of recovery wells at the surface.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading