Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The word fuel describes a material employed to produce heat, power, or light. Wood, coal, oil, natural gas, uranium, and biomass are currently the most used conventional fuels. Because the processing of these materials generally involves continuous combustion, the word has lent itself to the idea of revitalizing emotions. The word fuel can represent an inner force that motivates humans, a force that boosts activities and emotions.

A key difference between “material fuel” and “fuel of will” stems from the fact that the latter is supposed to be strong enough to sharpen the everyday life of ordinary humans so that it is renewed time and again. In contrast, the most important materials employed in the 21st century to produce heat, power, or light are exhaustible, nonrenewable, and have pollution as a side effect: they cannot be used without paying the corresponding costs.

Finite Fossil Fuels

Coal, oil, and natural gas are called fossil fuels because they are formed when decomposed plants, animal matter, and marine organisms are combined with heat and pressure beneath the surface of the Earth. A process of chemical change sustained over millions of years transforms the fossil remains into carbon and compounds of carbon and hydrogen, which release a large amount of heat under combustion. They therefore constitute the fixed stock of fuels on Earth, a stock that, once expended to produce energy, cannot be restored. To keep track of the world's fuel reserves, an array of specialized institutions that operate in the private sector and in international forums publish annual assessments of the proven reserves, probable (recoverable) reserves, and unknown or undiscovered resources. “The World Energy Council Survey,” the “International Energy Agency Information Report, “The Oil & Gas Journal Report,” and the “BP Statistical Review” were the most quoted sources of information as of 2010.

In spite of its technical dimension, the estimation of the stock of fossil fuels was hotly debated in the past. The possibility that the world might be running out of oil provoked great concern among both the authorities and the public at large. Two moments stand out in the trend for geological pessimism: the first quarter of the 20th century in the United States and the 1960s and early 1970s across Europe, Japan, and North America. Fears of an oil shortage played an important role in triggering public awareness of the need to conserve natural resources. Ultimately, the conservationist currents, which ripened within the wealthy, educated segments of the population, evolved toward more politically oriented ecological movements. To face Earth's challenges, they called for energy-saving policies on the demand side and tighter regulation of private business on the supply side. However, the gloomy predictions of a looming age of scarcity were dashed by unfolding events: first, untapped oil reserves were discovered in the United States, which turned anxiety about a shortage into glut management (1926–29); and second, the price hike triggered by the Middle East Arab oil embargo and production cuts (1973–74), whereby long-term ecological pessimism was replaced by a critical, immediate energy crisis.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading