Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Evolving from tabulation machines used to handle growing volumes of information in the early 20th century, computers became integral to the function of businesses large and small by the 21st century. Beginning in the 1950s, gigantic mainframe computers—primarily manufactured by International Business Machines (IBM)—handled information at large corporations; a decade later, advances in microprocessor technology allowed smaller businesses to purchase microcomputers or even desktop models to handle records. Today, businesses in both developed and developing nations rely on mass-produced computers to handle their needs. Though increasingly large volumes of computers and printers are disposed of annually, they do not necessarily follow a linear trajectory from consumption to disposal and waste. Instead, business disposal practices increasingly involve further rounds of consumption through reuse and refurbishment prior to eventual disposal. Like other forms of cast-off electronics, the consumption and wasting of computers and printers used in business environments is a culturally distinctive practice that varies from place to place.

Disposal Options

In North America and Europe, business concerns about data security and liability arising from breaches tend to trump concerns about the environmental consequences of information technology (IT) disposal. These concerns have spawned an industry known as information technology asset disposition (ITAD). The ITAD industry offers a number of disposal options including reuse, refurbishing, re-marketing, data sanitization, and recycling of computers, printers, and other electronics. In 2010, nine leading ITAD firms in the United States had combined revenues of between $265 and $345 million annually. Fueling the growth of this industry are a number of information privacy laws that carry stiff economic penalties if companies are found in breach.

ITAD firms actively encourage reuse, remarketing, refurbishing, and the like for their business clients. ITAD company Websites market these services in a way that suggests that recycling should occur only when equipment cannot be repurposed or redeployed. The emphasis in the business sector on reuse and refurbishment thus marks an important contrast with the household consumer sector, which is encouraged to replace older computers and printers with new ones, even when they could be reused or repaired. Meanwhile, in Asia, Africa, and South America, computers, printers, and other business IT assets circulate within complex informal recovery economies that refurbish, repair, and remanufacture this equipment as well as disassemble them into their constituent components and materials, which are then fed back into the production economy. However, the disposal and recovery of computers and printers from business waste is far from being a closed-loop production system. Patterns of disposal and recovery raise a number of controversial issues that link economic questions with moral ones about poverty, survival, economic production, health, and the environment.

Criticisms

While there are key differences between the business sector and the personal consumption sector in terms of consumption and disposal practices, the disposition of electronics from either sector has similar effects. Attempts to mitigate the health and environmental effects of electronics disposal focus on formalizing recycling. These strategies include product take-back programs and industrial-scale material and energy recovery systems. In North America, Europe, and parts of Asia and Africa, these strategies are increasingly mandated by law. While such efforts may appear beneficial, there is a debate about their efficacy. Formal industrial-scale recycling can recover substantial amounts of material and energy. It can also reduce the need for mining new raw materials. However, it also leads to what some argue is a wasteful destruction of working computers and printers that could, under the right conditions, be fit for reuse by people and businesses otherwise unable to afford them. Moreover, relying on recycling to manage waste computers and printers from business environments cannot escape the problems of materiality. Recycling at an industrial scale typically requires transportation of equipment over long distances to recycling facilities, thus adding to the environmental footprint of disposed electronics. Industrial-scale recycling machinery requires substantial amounts of energy that must be generated in some manner, thus raising the likelihood of CO2 and toxic emissions. Smelting for material and energy recovery from electronics can release toxic substances such as lead. Some argue that formalized recycling risks merely shifting the loci of toxic burdens of cast-off electronics rather than truly eliminating them. Others contend that the emphasis on recycling is a trap that risks foreclosing on options for the cleaner production of original products.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading