Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Cloaca Maxima, literally meaning “greatest sewer,” was the largest sewer system in the ancient world. According to the Roman historian Pliny, this wonder of the ancient world was constructed in the 6th century B.C.E. by the two Tarquin kings and was a permanent reminder to the Romans of their ancient history. Pliny emphasized the Cloaca's durability as well as its savage discipline of construction; sewer workers—mainly forced labor drawn from Rome's poorer residents—who committed suicide were said to have had their bodies crucified as an example to others.

It is probable that the Cloaca was originally an open drain, formed from streams from three of Rome's hills, which were channeled through the main Forum and then on to the river Tiber. This open drain would then have been gradually built over, as space within the city became more constricted. The sewer was originally meant to drain land only, with the city's other waste matter being flushed into the Tiber. However, as Rome's population grew, the sewer increasingly became a dumping ground for unwanted wastes and became choked with filth. In 33 B.C.E., the emperor Agrippa demonstrated how he had unblocked the Cloaca Maxima by riding through it on a boat. In the 21st century, this foundation layer of Rome's history remains open to curious tourists, and the original outfall of the sewer into the Tiber is still preserved.

Although widely documented in ancient writings, the Cloaca Maxima was only “discovered” more widely in the 18th century when Rome was undergoing renewed archaeological investigations. From 1748 to 1774, the artist Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720–78) published an extensive series of views of Rome focusing on its ancient archaeological remains that included the Cloaca Maxima. Piranesi's son Francesco collected and preserved the views and published them in 29 volumes from 1835 to 1837. Thereafter, the Cloaca Maxima became widely known in Europe and was to attain enormous importance as a prototype for the new drainage systems being planned in major European cities, particularly London and Paris, both of which vied to become the “new Rome” in the 19th century.

Applications

In the 1860s, London's sewer system was being transformed by the engineer Joseph Bazalgette (1819–91), with new intercepting sewers constructed to prevent waste matter from polluting the river Thames. During its construction, comparisons to ancient Rome and its sewer were consistently evoked. The journalist Henry Mayhew (1812–87) described London's sewers as second only to the “giant works of sewerage in the eternal city,” while Bazalgette used the Cloaca Maxima as a prototype for London's sewers in his lectures on his new drainage system.

When London's new sewers were completed, the press were almost ecstatic in their praise. In a ceremony held in 1865 to mark its formal opening, some newspapers compared the new sewers with the wonders of the ancient world. According to the Daily Telegraph, the main drainage system was a project alongside which even the pyramids of Egypt and the sewers of Rome “paled into comparison.” The Marylebone Mercury made similar comparisons: the main drainage system was described as the “representation of a mighty civilisation,” a civilization nobler than ancient Rome because it lacked its “despotic power.” Underlying these comparisons was the view that London's new sewers were a permanent monument to the future when the city—especially compared with its main rival, Paris—would become the cleanest and most magnificent city the world had ever seen. If the content of London's new sewers was “not a bit better” than that in the sewers of Paris, their technological and political basis most certainly was. Under Napoleon III and Baron Haussmann in the 1860s, Paris was undergoing a more radical transformation than London. New boulevards were driven through the medieval city, and new sewers were constructed beneath them. While some criticized London's government for not “Haussmanizing” London enough, most celebrated the city's new sewers as making the city above comparison with any other European capital. If Bazalgette had done “what Tarquin did for Rome,” he did it without the “despotic power” of the latter. The fact that Napoleon III was also self-consciously modeling his new Paris sewers on this Roman precedent also points to an implicit criticism of his despotic methods.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading