Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The definition of the term tradition is wide ranging and fluid. It is commonly accepted to refer to a set of practices, customs, or values, largely of a symbolic nature, that are passed through generations through repetition (and often ceremony) thus inferring a sense of continuity and identity. Traditions are often held in high regard, as perceived wisdom transmitted from one generation to the next to be revered and protected. The term inventing tradition was first coined by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger in their 1983 publication The Invention of Tradition to describe fictitious, socially constructed practices, which are governed (both overtly and tacitly) by accepted rules and/or ritual to inoculate certain values, norms, and behaviors. This groundbreaking but contested collection of essays questioned the authenticity of seemingly “indigenous” or “true” traditions and suggested that many are in fact recent constructions that have been imagined to serve particular agendas in the present day. The process or act of “inventing” a tradition, they suggested, emanates from “novel situations which take reference to old situations or which establish their own through quasi-obligatory repetition” (1983, 9). Through this modernist-constructivist reading of community and nationality, the traditions to which each subscribe are embedded effectively in traditions that are ultimately determined not by historical “fact” but by an aggregation of sentiment, nostalgia, and politics all stemming from the identity requirements of the moment.

Invented traditions are said to differ from indigenous or “authentic” traditions in that they are social fabrications that are enacted or established to construct some sort of lineage with the past that is not necessarily there. While many are new cultural creations, others borrow, evolve from, and merge with the past. Through time, their origins become blurred or romanticized until it is no longer possible to differentiate between the original and invented tradition. Hobsbawn (1983) draws on the invention of new architectural traditions in Britain in the late-nineteenth century to illustrate this point. The intellectual elite at that time chose to construct parliament buildings (as a national symbol) using materials and a style reminiscent of the Neo-Gothic Era as opposed to the Classical trend of that time. They believed the medieval reimaginings of Parliament were more congruent with the English national character. The Gothic style the buildings eventually assumed implied a natural continuity with the past despite being subject to extensive revisionism.

Functions

Invented traditions are inextricably linked to the heritage process and the construction of identity, heritage meaning the selective use or manipulation of the past in and for the present. Like heritage, invented traditions are not “given;” rather, they are “made” and serve a number of social, political, and economic functions. The motivations for constructing or inventing a connection with the past are wide ranging but appear to stem primarily from the need for some sort of social cohesion. Hobsbawm (1983, 9) believes there are three “types” of invented traditions: “(1) those establishing or symbolizing social cohesion or membership of groups, real or artificial communities; (2) those establishing or legitimizing institutions, status or relationships of authority; and (3) those whose main purpose was socialization, the inoculation of beliefs, value systems, and conventions of behaviour.” All three give weight to the idea that the invention of tradition is a highly political process where cultural practices and acts are symbolically constituted to evoke memories of the past, which serve to strengthen a group's position and/or its institutions in the present. Evoking, enacting, and inventing tradition has been an integral part of nation-building for centuries. Nations are in effect groups of people who believe they consist of a single people based on shared criteria, which can be both cultural and historical. In these “imagined communities” as Anderson called them in 1993, all of the members will never truly know each other; nations are created and flagged through the invention and reinvention of tradition. Responsible for formally instituting contrived practices or activities, the role of national governments in inventing traditions is fundamentally important. They are responsible for manipulating the nation's story into a narrative that underpins the essence of nationalist ideology. This ideology, permeated by myths and historical inaccuracies, is commonly referred to as a form of emotional glue, which binds people together and promotes a collective identity; it is tradition that helps formulate this ideology through creating a moral code or consciousness. The late-nineteenth and early twentieth century in Europe, for example, saw a wave of nation-building unleashed by the dissolution of empires and the call for self-determination. Across Europe, new national governments took a vested interest in the production of enduring national identities and their accompanying narratives. At the cornerstone of each was a series of invented or reinvented traditions. It is important to note that inventing tradition is not solely the preserve of the state. Operating on a number of scales, forging a connection with the past is just as important to a small ethnic or cultural group as the nation-state in its quest for legitimization and validation. Invented traditions are also especially important to groups whose identity is under threat. In such cases, there are pronounced attempts to exhibit a strong, resilient, and authentic identity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading