Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term fashionable refers to behavior adopted generally and uniformly by groups of people in a certain period of time and in a particular field of action. Such behavior is characterized by its broad diffusion within the group, which is also explicitly aware of its transitory nature: what is in fashion is bound soon to go out of fashion. Fashion concerns not only the clothing of the body but also the consumption of objects (e.g., furniture) and ideas. The term is used to denote behaviors and preferences in different areas of action, thought, and moral belief, as well as in music, art, leisure, science, religion, or politics.

In the majority of the European languages, the term used to refer to fashion (mode in French, Mode in German, moda in Italian, moda in Spanish) has a broader meaning that also includes similar phenomena like fads. From this perspective, a phenomenon that is in vogue has three main distinguishing characteristics. First, it is the most frequent behavior among those observable in a particular sphere of action (and it therefore corresponds to a specific statistical measure termed mode). But this is not enough: according to Rolf Meyersohn and Elihu Katz, only when there exists widespread awareness of the fashionability of a certain phenomenon, and when it is labeled “fashionable,” can one speak of fashion in the social sense. Hence, fashion is a conscious and reflexive form of behavior. Finally, a phenomenon possessing the two previous features is considered fashionable when it is perceived as new compared with previous phenomena similar to it and of predictably brief duration.

More specifically, the term fashion is today normally used to refer to the modern custom of dressing in accordance with norms laid down by fashion designers and by clothes manufacturing firms and that are disseminated through a system of specialized media such as fashion shows and magazines. As Yuniya Kawamura argues in her book Fashionology (2005), fashion can be considered a particular social institution, with its own norms and organizations. This is the topic addressed here.

Fashion and the Modern World

Some scholars maintain that fashion, as a form of regulation of collective behavior, is characteristic of all human cultures. Jennifer Craik in her book The Face of Fashion (1994), for example, argues that the fashion impulse exists in all cultures and embodies the achievement of distinctiveness in dress through clothing codes and symbols, whose aim is to express belonging to a group and at the same time the individual's desire to assert his or her personality. The predominant view, however, is that there is a strict connection between fashion as we know it today and the modern world, and that fashion as an institution has been essentially Eurocentric and capitalist. Numerous researchers date the birth of the first fashionable behavior to the second half the fourteenth century, when it was concomitant with the rapid growth of trade and economic enterprises in many parts of Europe. That period, in fact, saw radical change in the relationship between the individual and society. There arose the idea that value doesn't always reside in the immutability of social structures inherited from the past, because the individual personality—autonomous and responsible for its own choices—can have value in itself. To be appreciated, therefore, was the capacity to design and to direct one's own life, that is, the capacity to differentiate oneself from others by making autonomous choices. The appearance of the first short-lived fashions in the princely courts of the fourteenth century expressed the need to represent this new value attributed to the individual's autonomy through the manner in which the body was clothed. Thereafter, fashion developed as individuality became progressively valorized in the social structure, the more that society became flexible. In societies where the social structure was rigid and where individuals had almost no chance of changing their social position, there was neither the requirement nor the need to express one's belonging and identity through dress. Today, however, now that the social structure has become flexible and individual mobility is high, belongings are always uncertain and modifiable, and identities are provisional and negotiable. The modifiability of dress can thus become an important instrument of social relations, notes Elizabeth Rouse.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading