Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Family is one of the central organizing units of consumption. Within the context of the family, we make collective and individual choices, express social and emotional bonds, draw from and resist the pressures of consumer culture, and learn how to be consumers through fundamental socialization processes. However, questions on what family means and on how to define family are increasingly relevant in contemporary society and continually challenge existing theories of consumption. Demographic and sociocultural shifts around the world have made traditional definitions of family a distant memory. Recent U.S. Census numbers indicate that single persons constitute over 30 percent of the households in the United States. Though divorce rates are low in most Latin American (predominantly Catholic) countries and in Muslim countries, they have grown rapidly in general, especially when compared to the rapidly declining marriage rates. In Europe, more than in the United States, marriage is seen as increasingly unnecessary, and the incidence of children being born outside of marriage has reached over 50 percent in countries such as Iceland and Sweden and is projected to reach that level in France, Denmark, and the United Kingdom in the near future (Petre 2006). Family units are steadily shrinking in size, and singleparent and single-person households are growing at far more rapid rates than the traditional parents-with-children households.

As often noted in U.S. and European contexts, the “deterioration” of family has emerged as a regular focus of increasingly anxious public debate. The debate centers on the meaning and nature of family. This entry examines various ways of defining family, including cross-cultural differences reflected in public policies; identifies and critiques the treatment of family in consumer research; outlines methodological issues in family studies; and presents future research directions.

Alternative Views on Family

Among the various ways to define family, three dimensions have been suggested that aid in characterizing family: structural, psychosocial, and transactional. Structural definitions of family are based on the presence or absence of certain family members, whether it is an intact nuclear family, three or four generations under one roof, a same-sex couple, a single parent with children, a step-family, or a single person with a network of relationships. Psychosocial definitions relate to the accomplishment of certain tasks, such as maintaining a household. Finally, transactional definitions are based on behaviors that generate emotional ties and a sense of identity through interaction. For example, households, particularly African American households, often include individuals informally adopted as a “family” member (i.e., “fictive kin”).

Another way to characterize families is using a temporal dimension. We tend to distinguish between members who make up our current families—formed either through procreation or voluntary selection—and members who are a part of our families of origin. Family transitions such as deaths, marriages, births, christenings, medical emergencies, divorce, and family reunions may see a short-term reconstitution of ties in the extended family. While many of these reunions may be short-lived, they also may cue the extended family, reminding us of our lineage and a larger relational body with shared values. Thus, blood ties, as often represented by the family of origin, may yield a longer-lasting—though not necessarily proximal—set of relationships.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading