Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In recent decades, there has emerged an assumption that in commercial consumer cultures, domestic services have become increasingly commodified. Domestic services refers to household work tasks that allow the social reproduction of members of the household. Routine domestic services range from everyday housework tasks (e.g., housecleaning, laundry, ironing, cooking, and washing up) through household administration and gardening to caring activities (e.g., child care, elder care, and pet care). Nonroutine domestic services, meanwhile, range from house-maintenance tasks (e.g., outdoor painting, plastering, decorating, and mending broken windows and appliances) to home improvement activities (e.g., installing double glazing, insulation, putting in a bathroom suite, building an extension or loft conversion, putting in central heating, and carpentry).

Each and every one of these domestic services can be conducted using various sources of labor. For example, it cannot be asserted that cooking is always conducted as unpaid domestic work, and window cleaning by formal employees. Cooking, for instance, can be conducted as unpaid domestic work (e.g., where one cooks for oneself or one's family), unpaid community work (e.g., where one cooks for neighbors or friends on an unpaid basis), paid informal work (e.g., where one cooks in a restaurant on an off-the-books basis for “informal” payments that are not declared to the government for tax, benefit, or labor-law purposes), or formal employment (e.g., where one is a formally employed chef either registered self-employed or paid on a pay-as-you-earn basis). Different domestic services, therefore, do not belong to different types of work. Instead, all domestic services can be undertaken using each and every form of work.

Four basic types of work, therefore, can be used to provide domestic services. They are

  • self-provisioning, which is unpaid work undertaken by household members for themselves and other members of their household;
  • unpaid community work, which is work provided on an unpaid basis by and for the extended family, social or neighborhood networks, and more formal voluntary and community groups, and ranges from kinship exchange through friendship/neighborly reciprocal exchanges to one-way volunteering for voluntary organizations;
  • paid informal work, where legal goods and services are exchanged for money, but these exchanges are unregistered by, or hidden from, the state for tax, social security, or labor-law purposes; and
  • paid formal employment, which is paid work that is declared to the state for tax, social security and labor law purposes.

Domestic Services in Historical Perspective

A widespread belief is that over the long run of history, the provision of domestic services has steadily shifted from the informal economy (e.g., self-provisioning, paid informal work) into the formal economy. Indeed, this is the assumption underpinning the view that households are outsourcing ever-greater amounts of their domestic service provision to the formal economy.

Examining the household in historical perspective, a major historical shift has taken place away from household production for domestic consumption to a situation in which household members work for employers in exchange for wages. Household members have increasingly secured the livelihood of themselves and their codependents by selling their labor as a commodity within the labor market rather than by producing goods that satisfy their own immediate needs. This development is itself part of the wider separation of people from the means of production. Unable to produce their own goods for immediate consumption, modern workers (or their “breadwinners”) must sell their labor in exchange for cash to purchase goods on consumer markets. Goods, which had been made in the home or by local craftsmen for barter and only occasionally for market exchange, were gradually replaced by goods production en masse in factories. This led to a separation of home and production. Those who had previously made goods for their own use started to use their wages to purchase factory-made items. The transfer of domestic-service provision (rather than goods production) out of the sphere of self-provisioning and into the formal economy, however, has been rather slower. Indeed, and unlike goods production, the vast majority of domestic services are perhaps still met through self-provisioning. Whether domestic services will follow the same path as goods production from the home to the formal economy is therefore open to question.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading