Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Consumer nationalism combines two of the most important historical forces in modern history: the advent of consumerism and nationalism. Consumerism refers to consumption of branded, mass-produced goods and services and the orientation of social life around them. That is, consumerism involves the creation or reproduction of social identity through the consumption of mass-produced, branded, and advertised things. Consumer nationalism refer to efforts to define buying and using (or consumption) as a political statement through the nonconsumption of things from an offending country or countries and the consumption of one's own nationally produced goods and services.

Consumer nationalism often has two sides: nonconsumption of imports and consumption of domestic goods and services. Of the two, boycotts are the most visible and common form of consumer nationalism. Boycotts have been a central part of nationalist movements since at least the Boston Tea Party in 1773, when American colonialists destroyed crates of tea imported by the British East India Company to protest disadvantageous British tax policies. Since then, boycotts have been used by consumers in innumerable countries to express nationalism. Consumer nationalist boycotts have been launched against citizens of the same nation for a perceived injury by other members of that nation, including periodic boycotts by Americans of companies sponsoring “un-American” movies or the Nazi-led boycott against Jewish businesses in 1933. Such boycotts have been used frequently by consumers against targeted foreign countries. Boycotts against Japan, for instance, figured prominently in international relations on the eve of World War II, as consumers in countries such as the United Kingdom and United States launched boycotts to protest that country's policies in China.

Consumer Nationalist Movements

The modern Chinese experience reveals the range of consumer nationalist activities, ranging from boycotts led by individuals to state-enforced consumption of domestic products. Such activities in the era of imperialism precipitated or accompanied major turning points in relations between imperialist powers and their colonies. China had significant anti-imperialist boycotts in 1905, 1915, 1919, 1923, 1925, 1928, 1931, and then nearly continuously into the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945). Such boycotts may have even provoked the war with Japan, which sought to ensure continued market access. After the Chinese Communist victory in 1949, Chinese leaders finally and completely gained control over tariffs. Within a few years, the People's Republic of China (PRC) government effectively banned the importation of virtually all consumer goods, particularly those from capitalist countries. Chinese consumers had little choice but to “buy Chinese.” Thirty years later, China dramatically changed course. With the initiation of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, China slowly began to import consumer goods.

As the range and volume of imports have grown with global trade liberalization since the 1990s, consumer nationalist exploitation of the historic tension between “domestic products” and “foreign products” periodically reemerges, even as the foreign/domestic categories of products become obsolete. In the Chinese case, with the lead up to its ascension to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, there have been at least three reasons for renewed consumer activism. First, China's WTO commitments allow easier market access for multinationals, rendering countless domestic enterprises uncompetitive and creating millions of unemployed workers. Second, a new generation of patriotic students continues to invoke the language of economic nationalism and call for boycotts, as did those participating in the widespread boycotts of the French retailing giant Carrefour in China in the spring of 2008 in retaliation for the disruption of the Olympic torch relay in Paris. Finally, domestic consumers periodically call for boycotts of specific foreign products when they feel consumers collectively have been treated poorly or differently by multinational companies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading