Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Social distance, as the phrase is generally used now, is an easily grasped notion. When people are asked to name individuals they know, they can generally rank-order them from those with whom they have the “closest” relationships to those who are “farther away.” Everyone seems to have a sense for what social distance means on this interpersonal basis. At this level, social distance refers to the strength of the relational tie between people, ranging perhaps from strong attachment or affection (short social distance) to antipathy or possibly apathy (longer social distance). People use this awareness of social distance daily in circumstances ranging from sorting friends from foes, to determining which acquaintance is most likely to provide some form of social support. In this respect, then, the social distances among members of a community are a critical aspect of its cohesion and its ability to function.

Durkheim on the Social Causes of Suicide

The French social scientist Émile Durkheim is considered the founder of modern sociology. In his study of suicide published in 1897, he made extensive of use of statistical analyses to test his theories of suicide. The following extract succinctly summarizes his thoughts about the social causes of suicide.

Anomy, therefore, is a regular and specific factor in suicide in our modern societies; one of the springs from which the annual contingent feeds. So we have here a new type to distinguish from the others. It differs from them in its dependence, not on the way in which individuals are attached to society, but on how it regulates them. Egoistic suicide results from man's no longer finding a basis for existence in life; altruistic suicide, because this basis for existence appears to man situated beyond life itself. The third sort of suicide, the existence of which has just been shown, results from man's activity's lacking regulation and his consequent sufferings. By virtue of its origin we shall assign this last variety the name of anomic suicide.

Durkheim, Émile. (1951). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. New York: The Free Press, p. 258.

A Brief History of the Concept

In sociology, the use of the social distance concept dates back at least to the work of the German sociologist Georg Simmel (1858–1918), who wrote of the interesting social position occupied by a stranger newly arrived in a group. He characterized this position as a precarious balance between “nearness and remoteness” (Simmel 1908/1950, p. 402). The stranger is near in the sense that he or she has entered a group or community and has interacted with some members, perhaps for purposes of trade, but is remote or distant in that she or he does not share the common history, culture, or norms of the indigenous community members.

The American sociologist Emory Bogardus's conception of social distance, however, with its attendant measurement scale, is perhaps the best known and most widely used version. He defined social distance as “the degree of sympathetic understanding that functions between person and person, between person and group, and between group and group” (Bogardus 1959, p. 7). Bogardus originally developed the scale, a series of agree-disagree statements indicating increasingly lower levels of “sympathetic understanding” and thus greater social distance, in 1924 to assess perceived relations between an individual and racial-ethnic populations. The seven statements on this version of the scale range from willingness to marry a member of the specified racial-ethnic population to unwillingness to allow a member of this population to live in the respondent's country. As a tool that provided a measure of the degree of racial prejudice felt between populations, Bogardus's Social Distance scale was employed throughout the twentieth century by numerous scholars interested in race relations. The frequency of the concept's use in this form, however, should not be misinterpreted as the natural limits of the idea of social distance. Indeed, as Bogardus's definition indicates, he came to perceive that the concept should operate in many contexts. Consequently, Bogardus and other researchers have developed social distance scales for such attributes as age, religion, education, occupation, and social class.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading